<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from b50-11.minvenw.nl [145.50.39.11] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Wed, 25
Jun 2008 14:44:29 +0200
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I think most of the confusion comes from the name "Layer.GML". It almost
implies that the data comes from a GML file.
Maybe Layer.File would be more logical and generic?
Best regards,
Bart
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:37:46 +0200, "Andreas Hocevar"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric,
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Eric Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Although i find it weird to use a GML layer with a format different
>> than GML i agree that it's good to avoid code at the application
>> level. Thanks Andreas. Eric
>
> The one thing I learned from cr5 is that Layer.GML is for fetching
> vector datasets at once, and Layer.WFS for fetching parts of it based
> on a bbox filter connected to the map extent. No matter what data
> format.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@openlayers.org
> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openlayers.org
http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
