On 09/04/2008 02:04 PM, Graham Smith wrote: > Thanks both, > > This seems an amazing reduction in resource use. I'm surprised it > hasn't been commented on. What little I have read has assumed that 3 > will be bigger than 2. Indeed I had assumed this would be the case. > and one of the reasons of looking at it was getting an eeepc and I > wondered how much extra room it would need. > > Graham > > > 2008/9/4 Anthony Chilco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> 322meg for 2.4, 56meg for 3. Nothing in common files or application data >> that I can find. >> tc >> >> Graham Smith wrote: >>> >>> Out of curiosity, I could not resist having a look at the latest beta >>> of 3, but it seems to be only taking up 50Mb of disk space, compared >>> with 300Mb plus for 2.4 (WinXP in both cases). >>> >>> Does OOo 3 scatter its files around, or am I missing something >>> obvious, or have the OOo team really got the footprint down to 50Mb. >>> >>> Graham
I think folks are missing a few folders (linux): ooo-dev = 343.5 MB which contains: - basis3.0 = 333.6 MB - ure = 9.9 MB ooo-dev3 (for the development m4 version) = 39.5 MB So that adds up to around 383 MB of disk space. Then of course you need to add in anything that is added to your user profile folder (~/.ooo-dev3 or .ooo-dev). I'm not on my system with OOo3Beta nor on a Windows system right now, but I can pretty much guarantee that it will be similar. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
