NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you guys ALL THERE? This is the 50th time/message I have explained the situation........ I sent the blank email, but it will NOT work because it is sent from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address, which is a legitimate business address. I told you earlier that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (a created email address that is used just to attack my business-we have had problems all summer with our website www.montezumabrand.com being intentionally infected with trojans and viruses, our shopping cart deleted/eliminated, etc.) is forwarding this list maliciously and is the email address that needs to be unsubscribed. We have had tracers put on the emails, but to no avail. Passwords have been changed without a trace on the website and shopping cart-I am tired of the attacks, although we have cleaned the website through the server and taken control of the site and cart. However, I have no control over this email and therefore cannot unsubscribe. I need YOUR personal and manual intervention to unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
----- Original Message ---- From: H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@openoffice.org Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 3:45:06 PM Subject: [users] Re: OOo for technical writing: observations from writing experiments Harold Fuchs wrote: >> >> > You could try posting this to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I think > a) you *need* to subscribe to this list before you can post (unlike > users@openoffice.org) and > b) Your "To begin with, It misses some common grammar mistakes which it > shouldn't" will not be considered adequate. Examples with associated > definitions of required rules might buy you progress. Perhaps the page I linked to earlier can be useful. It has an example of a para that is used in queequeg. Here it is, shamelessly copied, for convenience: Paraphrases plays an important role in the variety and complexity of natural language documents. However, they add to the difficulty of natural language processing. Here we describe a procedure for obtaining paraphrases from news articles. Articles derived from different newspapers can contain paraphrases if it indeed report the same event on the same day. We exploit these two feature by using Named Entity recognition. Our approach is based on the assumption that named entities are preserved across paraphrases. We applied our method to articles of two domains and obtained notable example. I am curious, if you, or anyone else who is reading this post, could check grammar of this para in your installation of OOo, does it flag all the errors? > > You'll also need to specify the *exact* language you are talking about. US English. Though my locale is en_CA, but it is not supported in OOo so I use en_US in OOo. > For example, US and British English are *not* the same when it comes to Yes, I understand that. But from the feedback I see here, notice that the grammar checker attracts much more interest than the other points I listed in my OP. For technical writing, the other points though could make or break the decision to use a word processor and are usually considered more important than a grammar checker. Warm regards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
