Jim Allan wrote:
<Oops, I previously sent this message unintentionally. This is a
corrected version.
David Offill wrote:
> My company's proprietary medical practice management software currently
> uses the legacy version OO 1.1.5 for all document usage, with excellent
> success.
>
> I have been tasked to look at the current production release (3.0?) to
> see if there would be any issues with upgrading our system to make use
> of this version.
>
> Questions:
>
> Is 3.0 the appropriate version to consider?
Version 3.0.0 is very buggy.
Compared to what? To OOo 1.1.5? Or OOo 2.4.2? OOo 3.0 may be buggy. But
it not more buggy than other OOo version. And for shure it's less buggy
than OOo 1.1.5.
Please be careful with such statements. You just unsettle potential OOo
users.
Supposedly all bugs will be fixed in the
next release, version 3.0.1, currently due to be released this month.
Sounds good but it's not true. Not all bugs will be fixed in OOo 3.0.1.
Groetjes,
Olaf
http://www.openoffice.org/
http://qa.openoffice.org/ooQAReloaded/FrameworkTeamsite/ooQA-TeamFramework.html
--
Sun Microsystems GmbH Olaf Felka
Nagelsweg 55 Quality Assurance Engineer
20097 Hamburg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
