----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon" <gbpli...@gmail.com> To: <users@openoffice.org> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:27 PM Subject: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish.
> Barbara Duprey wrote: > > Gordon wrote: > >> Ugly Me wrote: > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory L. Forster" > >>> <gforst.1...@sbcglobal.net> > >>> To: <users@openoffice.org> > >>> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:19 PM > >>> Subject: Re: [users] Re: ver 3 is rubbish. > >>> > >>> > >>>> WOW! I tweaked up the memory as suggested: > >>>> Use for OpenOffice.org - 256mb > >>>> Memory per object - 128 mb > >>>> > >>>> OpenOffice really sizzles now. I have an AMD Athlon X2 dual core 64bit > >>>> CPU at 2.6 Ghz with 4Gig memory and WinXP Pro SP3. I have to try that > >>>> on my Ubuntu machine (1.6Gig Celeron with 512Meg) > >>> > >>> To think that an old geezer like me felt I was really racing along > >>> when I > >>> upgraded my 16K 6502-based machine to 64K. > >>> Times sure change, young feller. > >> > >> Ah! Floppy A and B..... > > > > These young whippers -- the Apple II+ that was my first PC, in 1978, > > loaded and saved only with a tape recorder! Balancing the volumes for > > the channels was quite a challenge. The mainframes I was working on were > > better, but the speed and capacity were laughable compared to the > > cheapest PDA today. > > Hmmm. My Commodore 64 had a tape recorder.... I have this cool ad of William Shatner peddling a Vic-20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
