On 2010-05-10 4:42 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: > On 10 May 2010 09:32, Brewster Gillett <b...@fdi.us> wrote: >> bg: >> >> This is hardly rocket science. Posts are more easily and conveniently >> absorbed by the reader when they are arranged in their chronological >> order, oldest at the top, newest at the bottom. This is irrespective of >> whether they consist of multiple interspersions or not. >> >> Those of us who understand this may be forgiven for speculating >> that those who don't belong to some hitherto undiscovered species >> of primate :-) >> >> Brewster >> >> >> See what I mean?
And even worse is 'bottom-posting'+'blindly quoting the entire message'+'inserting your reply such that it appears as part of the text you are quoting, rather than as a standalone reply, as you did here Harold. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
