I have an AMD 1800+ (1.15Mhz), 512DDR,7200 40G HD. For
me, it takes 5 sec to load the OO 1.9.122 text
document, 4 sec to load OO 1.9.122 without using QS.(I
defrag on a regular basis of once per week.)

--- Mark Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 1.9.125 (v2,. Beta 2)  starts on Linux (RHEL4) in
> about 4 seconds---with 
> no special measures
> 
> David Teague wrote:
> 
> >
> > There have been articles about load time for
> OpenOffice.org
> > components. The consensus was that ooqstart-gnome
> or other
> > preloader could help. That didn't help me much,
> but Iike OO.o
> > so much that I would leave a compent loaded so the
> start time
> > is minimized. The following works well, and
> doesn't require
> > that you leave a copy of OO.o running.
> >
> > There is an article in Linux Journal by Tom
> Adelstein on how
> > to speed up loading  OpenOffice.org. Here is a
> link:
> >
> > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8308
> >
> > The author posted on the Ubuntu Users group
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following
> >
> >
> > "You can add a quickstart applet to GNOME by
> installing the program 
> > ooqstart- gnome, which may help some. However, an
> internal adjustment 
> > to OOo Writer can improve the entire
> > suite's performance.
> >
> > [Under Windows XP it cuts the load time from about
> 100 seconds
> > to about 20 seconds]
> >
> > "To accomplish this, you need to start the word
> processor, Writer. 
> > Next, you need to open the Tools drop-down menu
> and select options. 
> > Once you open the options box, you are ready to
> adjust the memory and 
> > speed up your Linux productivity suite. (see
> figure 3 in the article)
> >
> >
> > [The author evidently posted an image here, the
> Ubuntu list removed
> > it, but I followed the link above and figured out
> what he is saying.]
> >
> >
> > "In the above figure, you can see that we selected
> the first expansion 
> > box and then clicked Memory with our mouse. This
> exposed the window 
> > you see in Figure 3. I changed the default values
> under the Graphics 
> > cache for Use for OpenOffice.org and Memory per
> Object. I increased 
> > the first value from 6 to 128MB. I also increased
> the second value 
> > from .5 to 20MB.
> >
> > "After clicking OK, I closed the word processor
> and reopened it two 
> > times. On each occasion, the application took less
> time to open. Under 
> > Ubuntu, I found that OO Writer opened in three
> seconds, and in Fedora 
> > it opened in less than six seconds. Previously, it
> took 30 and 26 
> > seconds,
> > respectively, for the word processor to launch.
> >
> > "NOTE: So people doubted the hack, but then others
> came back and said 
> > it works absolutely.
> > It does work. But consider the other
> optimizations. "
> >
> >
> > This hack reduced startup time for my Windows
> system from an
> > annoying 15-20 seconds with the quick starter to 2
> - 3 seconds
> > (also with the quick-starter).
> >
> > It appears to me that you must have enough memory
> to support
> > both this and your other resident software for
> this to be successful.
> >
> > Would someone please comment on this idea?
> >
> > David Teague,  http://cs.wcu.edu/~dbt
> > Advocating Free Software and Double Bass tuned in
> fifths
> > www.dennismasuzzo.com;  www.silviodallatorre.com
> > www.joelquarrington.com/;  For information on Red 
> Mitchell,
> > http://home.teleport.com/~mimuma/; 
> www.larryholloway.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to