On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:08 -0700, NoOp wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 11:28 -0700, NoOp wrote: > >> G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > >> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 23:18 -0700, NoOp wrote: > >> >> G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 01:32 +0300, Andrius Aštrauskas wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:49:56 -0400 > >> >> >> "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I have not seen what you describe. If you look at > >> >> >> > http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/OOo2.x/user_guide2_draft.pdf > >> >> >> > or the Setup Guides you will see they load quickly and internal > >> >> >> > cross-references are honoured. So, I suggest that you enter an > >> >> >> > issue > >> >> >> > into Issue Tracker as this is the best way to have problems such as > >> >> >> > this evaluated. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Certainly I'll do that. It'll only take a while to modify the files - > >> >> >> I cannot send the one's I work with. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> But first about the users guide (it's the file we both have now). > >> >> >> > >> >> >> All four levels are displayed on opening - is this intended > >> >> >> behaviour? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The links in table of contents don't work. Should they? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > They do on my system using xpdf or acroread. > >> >> > >> >> The users guide TOC links do _not_ work on my system using Adobe Acrobat > >> >> Professional v.7.0. They also do _not_ work in Adobe Reader 7.0. or > >> >> Acrobat 4.05c. > >> >> > >> >> The http url's in the document _do_ work Acrobat & Adobe Reader 7.0. > >> >> They _don't_ work in Acrobat 4.05c simply because I've turned that > >> >> feature off. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > I think you have a local problem. You are aware that the TOC links are > >> > bookmarks. If this is not what you want, then please file an RFE against > >> > the code as the documents are generated using stock OOo. To enter an > >> > >> Could be a local problem. However, if I download the OpenOffice.org1.x.x > >> User Guide in .sxw format > >> (http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/index.html) and then export > >> that to a pdf: File|Export as PDF, the resulting PDF TOC links work just > >> fine. Downloading and opening that document in PDF format also results > >> in the TOC links working. > >> > >> Given that the 1.x.x users guide TOC's work fine, and the 2.x users > >> guide TOC's do not, I suspect it is a OOo PDF production problem instead > >> of a local problem. > >> > > > > Fine. However, what is your point? That I must regenerate everything > > with every release of OOo? If yes, then it will not happen. I generate > > the PDF when changes are made using the current stable release. However, > > no one has bothered to mention what release of OOo they use in trying to > > make some sort of point. I encourage any who are interested to use issue > > 29679 to help. You may attach your PDF to the issue for review. > > No _point_ other than simply _trying to assist_ from a end-users > perspective by verifying that the 2.x.x TOC's not working: 1) does not > appear to be a local problem (as far as I can tell), and 2) testing with > 1.x.x TOC as a control for comparison. >
Using the issue would be best. I am not the only person working on the document. > The release of OOo is largely irrelevant as the issue was whether or not > the TOC PDF links were working in a PDF reader. In my case I provided > you with the readers and versions used. However for the record, my OOo > version is 2.02 (Win32), and that is the version that I used to generate > the test PDF for the 1.x.x userguide. Further, I've no desire to submit > a 5.85MB test PDF for review. > Then your comments are wasted. Too bad you feel that contributing in a positive way by using the issue provided is too much trouble. > Given that the 2.x.x doc is a draft, I would have thought that perhaps > you would have appreciated the feed back and, that someone had taken an > hour of their time to test & verify using different commercial PDF > readers in the process. It appears you do not. > Normally, yes but dev@openoffice.org is the list in which to discuss documentation issues. > > > > BTW, this discussion belongs on dev@documentation.openoffice.org If you > > care to continue this discussion, look to this list. > > My responses were in response to the thread started in > gmane.comp.openoffice.questions and certainly is on-topic for the > thread/list subject "Converting to pdf: need help", and the question > asked by the OP: > > > The links in table of contents don't work. Should they? > > I've no desire to wander off into a developers thread/list to "continue > this discussion" but thanks anyway. Sad you will not participate. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
