Re: [users] ello all, Sorry for the OT. Although I have been 'freed' from M$ oppression for several years now, my formal stance on it is quite 'neutral'. Like the saying in IT, "It's all just a tool for IT man, doesn't really matter whether it is FLOSS or M$'. B

[Curt Eiworth]

2007-08-31 kl. 13.14 skrev jonathon:


<snip>


For this vote M$ is working very heard to ensure that the following
standards are adhered to:
* a "yes" vote is a "yes"
* A "yes vote with comments"  is "yes"
* A "no vote with comments" is "yes"
* A "vote to abstain" is a "yes"
* A "no" vote" is an abstention;

If that does not result in a majority of "yes" votes, then votes w2ill
be discarded until they have the majority of votes.  Discarded votes
are to come from "no" votes.  Votes are discarded on the basis that
"no" means "yes".
<snip>

FYI the Swedish Standards Institute (SIS) that voted "yes" monday today 
rescinded their decision  declaring it illegal because "one of the 
members voted twice".

Would that be considered a de facto 'yes'?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]