> 2008/5/3 Twayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi, >> >> XP Pro, OOo 2.4 >> I'm hoping for a response from one of the authors or gurus here. >> >> Will version 3.0 of OO.o repair the image positioning problems for >> large documents and especially for Master Document Mode? >> >> Details/History: >> >> There was a problem in version 2.3 where with large documents greater >> than around ten Meg, images, especially in tables, would begin >> rearranging themselves and even jumping out of the table cells and >> fully or partially covering each other. >> I did a bunch of research, couldn't find a similar issue, so I >> submitted one of my own which was then deemed to be "already >> reported", so I was semi-comfortable that it would be worked on. >> > > When your issue was deemed "already reported", did the "deemer" give > the original issue number (the one of which yours was a deemed to be a > duplicate) and, if so, what is its status? If it's not "fixed" or > otherwise closed, would it be worthwhile entering a question against > it, citing your new evidence? If it is closed, perhaps a new issue > again citing your new evidence? > > Or perhaps you've already done all this, in which case apologies for > trying to teach my grandmother to suck eggs.
lol, no problem w/r to your following up. Yes, the original issue's number was given and I did check it. I disagreed that it was the same thing, but then I'm just a user so wasn't given much weight w/r to opinions. In fact, a followup mail went unanswered. I'll have to look up any further details. To be honest, since that was on version 2.3, once 2.4 seemed to have at least made a bad situation merely annoying, I quit checking the status and no longer have the issue numbers, never suspecting it to extend to something like Master Document Mode. You might have a point though; I'll check my archives and see what I can come up with. To be bluntly honest, I'm not inclined to start a new issue regardless because, besides being a newbie to the process, I did a lot of work to be sure I wasn't duplicating anything and failed anyway because IMO of syntax. It took an inordinate amount of time working through the process properly which was disappointing. But that part is my problem; sorry about the vent. I will check my archives to see what I can find though. As before, this current problem seems to be only appearing for me so if I'm alone in the problem, it shouldn't be reported either; which is one of the things I hoped to hear about. There must be others trying to use Master Documents, especially as improved over anyone else's capabilities as OOo is. I no longer consider OOo to be an MS Office "replacement". It has surpassed that and stands on its own merits now. IMO at least. But ... as with all code ... <g>. Regards, Twayne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
