Am 2008-05-15 22:58:14, schrieb Michael Adams: > On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700 > Bob Estes wrote: > > Thanks, Harold. That clears up some misunderstanding for me. I > > recall some discussion recently about the need to cc: the original > > sender if the message came through the moderator. Wouldn't the "Reply > > All" function send a reply to the original sender? > > > > Yep, thats how i CC the OP when they are non list members (moderated > posters).
But only in theorie...
I am using a RFC-Conform MUA (mutt) and if I use <g> for Group-Reply
then the message goes only to the List. I can not reply to someone
privately.
I have had to set uo a procmail filter to remove the useless "Reply-To:"
header... and now I can use
<r> to send a message to the OP
<L> to send a message to the list
<g> to send a message to the list AND the OP
And of course I will not more put anyone in Cc: since I get always one
of two messages as spam-bounce (mailbox does not accept recipiens) oder
Challange-Reponse back...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
