Hello Inaki,

yes, it is almost sure that it does (except receiving this answer from
remote party). This is the reason all the people place loose-route
block before location query and this is why I have assumed that it
does not match the loose-routing and ends up to location query
automatically.
DanB

On 9/4/07, Marc LEURENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Like Dan said,
> send us your configuration, you may have forbidden something!
>
> Dan a écrit :
> > *_Scenario 1:_*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > U 212.34.169.220:5060 -> 78.45.146.34:5060
> >
> > BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0.
> >
> > Route: <sip:78.45.146.34;ftag=aa313a3c;lr>.
> >
> > CSeq: 2 BYE.
> >
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.34.169.220:5060.
> >
> > From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=03095807065938997270316869.
> >
> > Call-ID: 8246bf729f62a754.
> >
> > To: 58.68.96.11<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=aa313a3c.
> >
> > Content-Length: 0.
> >
> >
> >
> > #
> >
> > U 78.45.146.34:5060 -> 212.34.169.220:5060
> >
> > SIP/2.0 404 User Not Found.
> >
> > CSeq: 2 BYE.
> >
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.34.169.220:5060.
> >
> > From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=03095807065938997270316869.
> >
> > Call-ID: 8246bf729f62a754.
> >
> > To: 58.68.96.11<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=aa313a3c.
> >
> > Server: OpenSer (1.0.1 (i386/linux)).
> >
> > Content-Length: 0.
> >
> > Warning: 392 78.45.146.34:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=24525
> > req_src_ip=78.45.146.34 req_src_port=5060
> > in_uri=sip:78.45.146.34;ftag=aa313a3c;lr
> > out_uri=sip:78.45.146.34;ftag=aa313a3c;lr via_cnt==2".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *_Scenario 2:_*
> >
> >
> >
> > U 59.176.78.110:50496 -> 210.68.65.78:5060
> >
> > BYE sip:210.68.65.78 SIP/2.0.
> >
> > Route: <sip:@209.67.171.10;transport=udp>.
> >
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 59.176.78.110:50496.
> >
> > From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4154163258.
> >
> > To:
> > <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone>;tag=3005360702044301069847989.
> >
> > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > CSeq: 3 BYE.
> >
> > User-Agent: Cisco ATA  v2.15 ata18x (020927a).
> >
> > Content-Length: 0.
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> > #
> >
> > U 210.68.65.78:5060 -> 59.176.78.110:50496
> >
> > SIP/2.0 478 Unresolvable destination (478/TM).
> >
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 59.176.78.110:50496.
> >
> > From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=4154163258.
> >
> > To:
> > <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone>;tag=3005360702044301069847989.
> >
> > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > CSeq: 3 BYE.
> >
> > Server: OpenSer (1.0.1 (i386/linux)).
> >
> > Content-Length: 0.
> >
> > Warning: 392 210.68.65.78:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=2144
> > req_src_ip=59.176.78.110 req_src_port=50496 in_uri=sip:210.68.65.78.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In both cases BYE is not getting accounted for. Can anyone help me on
> > this ??
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFG3Q9/qjpLE0HiOBYRArgmAKCec0eFK2QQyBmV5eGoCWRmUOMM8ACgmFgp
> tOKvu9D6afXK2f8if8FABnM=
> =66HB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to