Aleksandar Ivanisevic <aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> writes: > Daniel Pittman <dan...@rimspace.net> writes: > >> So ... is there any sensibly way I could implement this without needing a >> private patch, other than to scan the process table after starting the >> container and rebuilding that mapping? > > What is so wrong with that approach, especially since ovz itself uses that > same technique, see i.e. /etc/cron.d/vz (or /etc/vz/cron/vz)?
Other tools have their own shortfalls, and strongly prefer to have a PID file on disk; to some degree, having that existing rather than spending time walking tho process table is appealing. Overall, though, it isn't so bad. :) Daniel -- ✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ dan...@rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707 ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users