I'v heard this from large VPS hosting provider.
Anyway, even our intenal projects require more then 100MB/s in peak and
more then 100 GB of storage (while only 100 GB are free). So local SSDs
are cheaper for us, then 10G network and commercial version of pstorage.
16.11.2015 15:22, Corrado Fiore пишет:
Hi Nick,
could you elaborate more on the second point? As far as I understood, pstorage
is in fact targeted towards clusters with hundreds of containers, so I am a bit
curious to understand where you got that information.
If there's anyone on the list that has used pstorage in clusters > 7 - 9 nodes
and wishes to share his or her experience, that's more than welcome.
Thanks,
Corrado
____________________________________________
On 16/11/2015, at 4:44 AM, Nick Knutov wrote:
Unfortunately, pstorage has two major disadvantages:
1) it's not free
2) it not usable for more then 1-4 CT over 1 gigabit network in real world
cases (as far as I know)
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Best Regards,
Nick Knutov
http://knutov.com
ICQ: 272873706
Voice: +7-904-84-23-130
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
