I did that already , setting "no" instead of "off" , but it seems the same , no success :-(

I have now doubt on *preventpromisc=on *which I cannot set to off :-( *

* [host]# prlctl list -if CTprobe  | grep net1
net1 (+) dev='veth42ba2f55' ifname='eth1' network='probenet' mac=001C42BA2F45*preventpromisc=on* mac_filter=off ip_filter=off nameservers= searchdomains=


Le 19/10/2016 13:36, Dmitry Mishin a écrit :
Hello,

Please try after 'prlctl set CTprobe --device-set net1 --macfilter off'

Thank you,
Dmitry.

From: <users-boun...@openvz.org <mailto:users-boun...@openvz.org>> on behalf of Jehan Procaccia <jehan.procac...@tem-tsp.eu <mailto:jehan.procac...@tem-tsp.eu>>
Reply-To: OpenVZ users <users@openvz.org <mailto:users@openvz.org>>
Date: Wednesday 19 October 2016 12:05
To: OpenVZ users <users@openvz.org <mailto:users@openvz.org>>
Subject: Re: [Users] vlan and bridge network interface in openVZ/virtuozzo 7

    Hello

    I'am back to my vlan/brige/vm-interface ...
    although it works fine for my containers primary interfaces (eth0)
    I have a specific container that has 2 interfaces, the second
    beeing for a probe on the network (tcpdump, snort etc ...)
    unfortunatly only minimal trafic seems to be forwarded into the
    container on that second interface , not all , I do see the wall
    trafic within the physical interface and its bridge on the
    physical host, but not on the veth into the CT !?.

    here's the physical and config situation: on the physical host I
    plug the cisco mirrored outbound/Wan interface to em3 (physical
    interface on the host)

    I created a virtual network for that probe attached to em3 and
    associated to bridge brs0

    # prlsrvctl net add probenet --type bridged --ifname em3
    # prlsrvctl net list
    Network ID        Type      Bound To Bridge         Slave interfaces
    Host-Only         host-only virbr0
    *probenet         bridged   em3 brs0           veth42ba2f55 *
    ...

    my CT 2nd interface (eth1, eth0 beeing the 1st one) is attached to
    that network

    # prlctl set CTprobe --netif_add eth1
    # prlctl set CTprobe --ifname eth1 --network probenet

    my problem is that a tcpdump -i em3 or bsr0 on the physical host
    do show all traffic on my outbound cisco Wan mirrored interface
    here is a very small sample (hundred of packats per secondes ...)
    # tcpdump -i brs0 -n
    10:40:58.767042 IP 193.51.224.142.https > 147.157.103.21.54757:
    UDP, length 1350
    10:40:58.767062 IP 193.51.224.42.https > 147.157.161.85.50813:
    Flags [.], seq 2056788:2058248, ack 511, win 1650, length 1460
    10:40:58.841239 IP 193.157.24.26.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1
    10:40:59.075644 IP 193.157.24.25.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1
    10:40:59.801310 ARP, Request who-has 193.157.24.30 tell
    193.157.41.1, length 46

    if I do the same tcpdump -i veth42ba2f55 or inside the CTprobe -i
    eth1 , only protocol trafic seems to pass through
    (STP,ARP,HSRP...), no users payload (https, ssh etc ...) , and
    only a dozen packets per seconds (they were hundreds on the brs0
    or em3)

    # tcpdump -i veth42ba2f55 -n
    10:45:30.918642 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    8d52.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.213516 ARP, Request who-has 193.157.41.45 tell
    193.157.41.1, length 46
    10:45:31.281744 ARP, Request who-has 193.157.41.17 tell
    193.157.41.1, length 46
    10:45:31.332678 IP 193.157.41.236 > 224.0.0.13: PIMv2, Hello,
    length 38
    10:45:31.383549 ARP, Request who-has 193.157.41.31 tell
    193.157.41.1, length 46
    10:45:31.456594 ARP, Request who-has 193.157.41.34 tell
    193.157.41.1, length 46
    10:45:31.458344 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    89ce.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.458898 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    8168.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.654835 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    89da.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.655039 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    89cf.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.709254 IP 193.157.41.35.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1
    10:45:31.966666 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
    89d0.00:20:56:1e:a6:80.8040, length 42
    10:45:31.993787 CDPv2, ttl: 180s, Device-ID 'core.ispint.fr',
    length 405

    Is the CT veth filtering trafic ? or cannot cope with the volume ?
    it is strange though that no payload/users trafic, only protocol
    (Xcast/broadcast ?) trafic pass from brs0 to veth42ba2f55 or
    inside the CTprobe eth1
    Am I  missing a "capability" ?

    Regards .

    Le 10/10/2016 21:24, Jehan Procaccia a écrit :
    Indeed !
    that was that last setting missing:

    prlctl set MyCT11 --ifname eth0 --network vlan11

    now vlans works fine
    Just note that I had to add NM_CONTROLLED="no" to all mi
    ifcfg-xxx definition files, otherwise network restart failed to
    start them

    regards .



    Le 10/10/2016 09:12, Vasily Averin a écrit :
    Dear Jehan,

    Virtuozzo 7 have nice documentaion on docs.virtuozzo.com

    
http://docs.virtuozzo.com/virtuozzo_7_users_guide/managing-network/configuring-virtual-machines-and-containers-in-bridged-mode.html?highlight=bridge

    in your case you need to bind container interface to
    newly-created bridge by using follwing command:

    prlctl set MyCT11 --ifname eth0 --network vlan11

    Thank you,
        Vasily Averin

    On 09.10.2016 22:37, Jehan Procaccia wrote:
    I found a method to configure bridge and vlan based on RHEL docs :
    
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Networking_Guide/sec-Network_Bridging_Using_the_Command_Line_Interface.html

    in order not to mess with current config automatically
    configured by virtuozzo7 installer on em1 and em2 with
    repective bridges br0 en br1, I plugged a 3rd interface on the
    server (fiber) p2p2 :

    [network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-p2p2
    TYPE=Ethernet
    BOOTPROTO=none
    NAME=p2p2
    UUID=9188d131-21b1-4ee9-8205-c893b4a4fc44
    DEVICE=p2p2
    ONBOOT=yes

    then the associated subinterface for vlan11 as described in
    RHEL7 doc

    # cat ifcfg-p2p2*.11*
    DEVICE=p2p2.11
    BOOTPROTO=none
    ONBOOT=yes
    VLAN=yes
    BRIDGE="br11"

    and finally the bridge for that vlan

    # cat ifcfg-br11
    DEVICE="br11"
    NAME="p2p2.11"
    ONBOOT=yes
    NETBOOT=yes
    IPV6INIT=yes
    BOOTPROTO=dhcp
    TYPE="Bridge"
    DELAY="2"
    STP="off"

    # ip -d link show p2p2.11
    41: p2p2.11@p2p2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500
    qdisc noqueue master br11 state UP mode DEFAULT
         link/ether f4:e9:d4:91:c4:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    promiscuity 1
         vlan protocol 802.1Q id 11 <REORDER_HDR> addrgenmode none

    # ip -d link show br11
    42: br11: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
    noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT
         link/ether f4:e9:d4:91:c4:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    promiscuity 0
         bridge addrgenmode none


    Now I can add my virtual network attached to the p2p2.11
    interface (or should I have chosed  br11 !?)

    #  prlsrvctl net add vlan11 --type bridged --ifname p2p2.11
    # prlsrvctl net list
    Network ID        Type      Bound To Bridge         Slave
    interfaces
    Bridged           bridged   em2            br1
    Host-Only         host-only                virbr0
    vlan11            bridged   p2p2.11        br11

    # brctl show
    bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled interfaces
    br0        8000.14187769840a    yes        em1
    br1        8000.14187769840b    no        em2
    br11        8000.f4e9d495c432    no        p2p2.11
    host-routed        8000.000000000000    no
    virbr0        8000.52540064dd31    no virbr0-nic

    create a container MyCT11
    # prlctl create MyCT11 --vmtype ct
    ...
    Processing metadata for centos-7-x86_64
    ...The Container has been successfully created.

    now I add an interface to my CT so that it will be in vlan11

    # prlctl set MyCT11 --netif_add eth0
    # prlctl set MyCT11 --ifname eth0 --ipadd 192.168.11.10/24
    # prlctl set MyCT11 --ifname eth0 --gw 192.168.11.1

    entering the CT an pinging the gateway unfortunatly fails

    CT-bad098d8 /# ping 192.168.11.1
    PING 192.168.11.1 (192.168.11.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    ^C
    --- 192.168.11.1 ping statistics ---
    3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms


    the pb seems that that new CT seems to be attached to an other
    bridge

    # prlsrvctl net list
    Network ID        Type      Bound To Bridge         Slave
    interfaces
Bridged bridged em2 *br1 * *veth4250fe85 *
    Host-Only         host-only                virbr0
    vlan11            bridged   p2p2.11        br11

    not to vlan11 network on br11

    I guess I missed something , where did I went wrong ?
    anyone has a full scenario to enable vlan through bridge mode
    in CT (and VM) ?

    regards .

    
http://docs.virtuozzo.com/virtuozzo_7_users_guide/managing-network/configuring-virtual-machines-and-containers-in-bridged-mode.html

    Le 07/10/2016 19:22, Jehan Procaccia a écrit :
    hello

    based on
    
https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_configuring_virtual_machines_and_containers_in_bridged_mode.html
    it is not clear to me how to create virtual networks
    associated to  vlans ?

    On a fresly installed Virtuozzo Linux release 7.2 (3515) on a
    host with 2 activated interfaces (em1 and em2) in trunk mode
    (cisco terminology switchport trunk, allowed vlan 10,11,12,
    native 10) I cannot find out how to create networks dedicated
    to a vlan

    I tried :
    # prlsrvctl net add vlan11 --type bridged --ifname em2
    Failed to add Virtual Network vlan11: This network adapter is
    already in use. Please select another network adapter and try
    again.

    I suspect that because em2 is already bridge to br1, it cannot
    be bridged anymore ?

    Or should I create a
    /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2.11 to have a
    interface dedicated to vlan11 :
    # cat ifcfg-em2.11
    DEVICE=em2.11
    ONBOOT=yes
    TYPE=Ethernet
    BOOTPROTO=none
    VLAN=yes

    an then try to: /prlsrvctl net add vlan11 --type bridged
    --ifname em2.11/ ?
    unfortunatly after /systemctl restart network/ , system
    complains with :

    Bringing up interface em2.11:  Error: Connection activation
    failed: No suitable device found for this connection.

    as anymone succeed in configuring CT and VM attached to vlan
    (in bridge mode as I want full feature network with
    multicast/broacast) ?

    Thanks .

    PS : few more information of the actual network config on the
    system :

    # ip addr | grep LOWER_UP
    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state
    UNKNOWN
    2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
    master br0 state UP qlen 1000
    3: em2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
    master br1 state UP qlen 1000
    8: venet0: <BROADCAST,POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500
    qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    22: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
    noqueue state UP
    23: br1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
    noqueue state UP

    # prlsrvctl net list
    Network ID        Type      Bound To Bridge         Slave
    interfaces
    Bridged           bridged   em2            br1
    Host-Only         host-only                virbr0

    it strange that em1 and br0 doesn't show up here !?

    # brctl show
    bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled interfaces
    br0        8000.14187769840a    no        em1
    br1        8000.14187769840b    no        em2
    host-routed        8000.000000000000    no
    virbr0        8000.52540064dd31    no virbr0-nic
    virbr2        8000.52540085818e    no virbr2-nic




    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@openvz.org
    https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users


    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@openvz.org
    https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users




    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@openvz.org
    https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to