Hello Paolo! We had libvirt driver for CTs some time ago. Its functionality was not on par with prlctl/vzctl and it was dropped from provided binary releases.
Best regards, Konstantin From: users-boun...@openvz.org <users-boun...@openvz.org> On Behalf Of Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 7:07 PM To: OpenVZ users <users@openvz.org> Subject: [Users] Question about libvirt and prlctl Hello OpenVZ community, Short question Is libvirt as complete as prlctl regarding OpenVZ/Virtuozzo containers management? Can we change resources independently and without reboot using libvirt instead of prlctl? Can we manage every aspect of a container on libvirt as we can on prlctl? - Full question I am developing a new open source OpenVZ control panel, as previously discussed here on the list, based on NodeJS to the back-end API and a modern front-end framework to the UI. The only challenge for me is the communication between NodeJS and OpenVZ and, after asking for suggestions about this on the openvz-dev list, the most prominent suggestion I received was to use the Virtuozzo SDK and node-gyp. The first problem that I faced on this approach was that Google is moving to gn, which means that the gyp's days of support are counted. Researching for an alternative for node-gyp, I found cmake-js, that works exactly like node-gyp, but instead of gyp, it is based on CMake build system. But it can't use C sources, but only compiled C libraries, and this approach started to get a little complex for me to follow alone. For this reason, I am currently considering to use libvirt and I would like to know if it has feature-parity with prlctl, when managing OpenVZ/Virtuozzo containers. Thanks again!
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
