Hello! My logic and intuition says - it would be nice if that libvirt can handle 10% of modern openvz functions. I highly doubt it has support for anything not in generalized list of VMs/VEs services - i.e. start/stop and may be take snapshot.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:09 PM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT < pauloco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello OpenVZ community, > > > *Short question* > Is libvirt as complete as prlctl regarding OpenVZ/Virtuozzo containers > management? Can we change resources independently and without reboot using > libvirt instead of prlctl? Can we manage every aspect of a container on > libvirt as we can on prlctl? > - > > *Full question* > I am developing a new open source OpenVZ control panel, as previously > discussed here on the list, based on NodeJS to the back-end API and a > modern front-end framework to the UI. > > The only challenge for me is the communication between NodeJS and OpenVZ > and, > after asking for suggestions about this on the openvz-dev list, the most > prominent suggestion I received was to use the Virtuozzo SDK and node-gyp. > > The first problem that I faced on this approach was that Google is moving > to gn, which means that the gyp's days of support are counted. > > Researching for an alternative for node-gyp, I found cmake-js, that works > exactly like node-gyp, but instead of gyp, it is based on CMake build > system. > > But it can't use C sources, but only compiled C libraries, and this > approach started to get a little complex for me to follow alone. > > For this reason, I am currently considering to use libvirt and I would > like to know if it has feature-parity with prlctl, when managing > OpenVZ/Virtuozzo containers. > > > > Thanks again! > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@openvz.org > https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Best regards, [COOLCOLD-RIPN]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users