hi please add support from solaris , ubuntu and other OS's. installation is a little hard specially in an evironment without internet. regards,
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Doron Fediuck <dfedi...@redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Karli Sjöberg" <karli.sjob...@slu.se> > | To: "Itamar Heim" <ih...@redhat.com> > | Cc: users@ovirt.org, "Jan-Olov Persson" <jan-olov.pers...@slu.se> > | Sent: Monday, September 2, 2013 10:42:52 AM > | Subject: Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt? > | > | Hi, > | > | I would like to see a more advanced type of Power-Saving Cluster policy, > | where an empty Host gets put into a sleep-mode, so that it draws as > little > | power as possible and can be awoken by engine when VM's starts to use > more > | resources. > | > | A typical scenario would be that all VM's are spread evenly over Hosts > during > | day-time, when customers are actively using their VM's. But then during > | off-hours, VM's gets clumped up into maybe one or two Hosts, and the > other > | Hosts can be put to sleep to save energy, and then woken up in the > morning > | again. > | > | /Karli > | > > Hi Karli, > this should be achievable for you in 3.3 with some minor work on your side; > In oVirt 3.3 we introduce the new scheduler, which allows you to run your > own > code when doing VM placement and load balancing. > > You can write your own load balancing logic replacing the built-in one, > which will switch to power saving at a given time. Once a host has no > running VMs, your balance logic can switch it into S3 state (sleep), and > when needed or in a given time use wake-on-lan to resume all suspended > hosts. > > If you want we can guide you through it post 3.3 release. > > Doron > > | tis 2013-08-20 klockan 17:19 -0400 skrev Itamar Heim: > | > | > | earlier in the year we did a survey for feature requests / improvements > | / etc. > | > | since a lot of things were added, and priorities usually change, I'd > | like to ask again for "what do you need the most from oVirt / what are > | your pain points" next? > | > | below[1] I've listed my understanding of what already went in from > | previous survey requests (to various degrees of coverage). > | > | Thanks, > | Itamar > | > | [1] from the top 12 > | V Allow disk resize > | V Integrate Nagios/Zabbix monitoring - via a ui plugin > | V Highly Available engine - via hosted engine[2] > | V Open vSwitch integration - via neutron integration > | X Allow cloning VMs without template > | ? Enable hypervisor upgrade/updates through engine[3] > | V Allow engine on an oVirt hosted VM - via hosted engine[2] > | V Enable guest configuration (root password, SSH keys, network) via > | guest agent in engine - via cloud-init > | X Integrate v2v into engine > | ? Bond/extend ovirtmgmt with a second network for HA/increased > | bandwidth[4] > | X Integrate scheduling of snapshots and VM export for backups in > | engine[5] > | V Spice – support Google Chrome - via mime based launch > | > | > | Other items mentioned in previous survey which should be covered by now: > | - Fix timeout when adding local host during all-in-one configuration > | - Fix engine set-up when SELinux is disabled > | - Provide packages for el6 (CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux) > | - Allow multiple VMs to be deployed from the same template at the same > | time > | - ISO domains on local/GlusterS > | - Show IP addresses in Virtual Machines->Network Interfaces > | - OpenStack Quantum support (now called Neutron) > | - noVNC support > | - Support spice.html5 and websocket proxy > | - Add other guest OSes to list > | - Port oVirt guest agent to Ubuntu[6] > | - SLA - Allow resource time-sharing > | - Spice - Mac client (via mime based launch) > | - Spice - port XPI plug-in to Windows (not sure this will happen, but > | mime based launch allows using firefox now) > | - Spice - client for Ubuntu/Debian (should be covered via mime based > | launch) > | > | > | [2] hosted engine is in active development, but not released yet. > | [3] host update is supported, but not for general yum update. > | [4] a lot of improvements were done in this space, but i'm not sure if > | they cover this exact use case > | [5] backup api is now being pushed to master, and orchestration of > | backups should probably happen via 3rd part backup vendors? > | [6] I'm not sure packaging exists yet, but ubuntu is covered for the > | basic functionality of the guest agent. > | _______________________________________________ > | Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org > | http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > | > | > | -- > | > | Med Vänliga Hälsningar > | > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > | Karli Sjöberg > | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences > | Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) > | S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden > | Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 > | karli.sjob...@slu.se > | > | _______________________________________________ > | Users mailing list > | Users@ovirt.org > | http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > | > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users