Le 29/12/2013 12:07, Ayal Baron a écrit :
Hi Karli,

----- Original Message -----

Skickat från min iPhone

28 dec 2013 kl. 16:04 skrev "Andrew Cathrow" <acath...@redhat.com>:

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com>
To: "Ayal Baron" <aba...@redhat.com>
Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
or not? Just to let the people understand..
Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
initial release due to policies red hat uses?
I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
too.. Or not?
There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that
would be possible within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two
such packages.
The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large
amount of backported features and bugfixes in many cases the backports
were significant, perhaps more than should have been done.
We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely to
carry a newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such
as RHEV and RHEL-OSP) so that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and
more aggressively rebase in the layered products.

The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same
source as qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't
currently build that package it could easily be done or perhaps built by
oVirt.
I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn
that this was not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why
not CentOS, you know...
Up until recently this was taken care of by Centos so there was no problem.
Now that it is not we're working on finding the best path to solve this.
There is no question that we will handle this.
However, glusterfs-3.4 is provided in the repos by the ovirt team (http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3.2/rpm/EL/6.5/x86_64/glusterfs-3.4.0-8.el6.x86_64.rpm) since an other gluster package is already available in the default el6 one... the same for jasperreport-server (http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3.2/rpm/EL/6.5/noarch/jasperreports-server-5.2.0-1.el6.noarch.rpm) since jasperreport-server 4.7.0 is available in the centos repo... Why couldn't be the case for qemu-kvm with qemu-kvm-rhev?
/K

Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--
Nathanaël Blanchet

Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5       
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
blanc...@abes.fr

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to