Hi Ted,
I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I can find
it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host profile?
Best regards
a
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000
From: Ted Miller <tmil...@hcjb.org>
To: oVirt Mailing List <users@ovirt.org>
Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or
Regression
Message-ID:
<a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf231116...@dm2pr05mb320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the time
I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning, so it
does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of people are
probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a
"rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I
substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla
987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where
"rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am
guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also
shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualization"
when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual-host".
(I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
Inviato da Tablet Samsung
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
