Yes Karli, These are different daemons.
-------- הודעה מקורית -------- מאת: Karli Sjöberg <karli.sjob...@slu.se> תאריך:08/01/2014 08:44 (GMT+02:00) אל: dfedi...@redhat.com עותק: ame...@oscert.net,users@ovirt.org,tmil...@hcjb.org נושא: Re: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression ons 2014-01-08 klockan 01:35 -0500 skrev Doron Fediuck: > Hi guys, > As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need > to verify tuned exists. Are "ksmtuned" and "tuned" different? # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.5 (Final) # service --status-all | grep tuned ksmtuned (pid 10438) is running... # chkconfig | grep tuned ksmtuned 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off /K > Once available, we'll be able to handle > the relevant profiles for hypervisors. > > > Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos? > > <-------- הודעה מקורית -------- <מאת: Amedeo Salvati <תאריך:08/01/2014 00:32 (GMT+02:00) <אל: users@ovirt.org,tmil...@hcjb.org <נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla <orRegression > > Hi Ted, > > > I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I > can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host > profile? > > > Best regards > a > > > > > Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000 > From: Ted Miller <tmil...@hcjb.org> > To: oVirt Mailing List <users@ovirt.org> > Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or > Regression > Message-ID: > <a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf231116...@dm2pr05mb320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts. > > One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At > the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just > a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a > warning, a lot of people are probably missing it. > > When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a > "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. > I substituted the "virtual-host" profile. > > I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla > 987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where > "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + > RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine > RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not > appropriate. > > My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses > "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it > falls back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences > there are between the two profiles.) > > Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other > path? > > Ted Miller > > > > > > > Inviato da Tablet Samsung -- Med Vänliga Hälsningar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karli Sjöberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 karli.sjob...@slu.se
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users