Hi, Also can add multiple ips to a single (VNIC) network interface...on Guest VM...
Thanks, Punit On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Daniel Helgenberger < daniel.helgenber...@m-box.de> wrote: > > On 16.09.2014 16:20, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Daniel Helgenberger" <daniel.helgenber...@m-box.de> > >> To: "Itamar Heim" <ih...@redhat.com>, "Livnat Peer" <lp...@redhat.com> > >> Cc: users@ovirt.org > >> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:17:20 PM > >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning > >> > >> > >> On 15.09.2014 15:23, Itamar Heim wrote: > >>> On 09/15/2014 04:10 PM, Daniel Helgenberger wrote: > >>>> Hello Livnat, > >>>> On 15.09.2014 14:46, Livnat Peer wrote: > >>>>> On 09/15/2014 03:15 PM, Daniel Helgenberger wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> +1 for the iso uploader, > >>>>>> +1 for hostusb in UI > >>>>>> +1 EL 7 (on the roadmap anyway?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> With hostusb some more host-dev virtualization could be added. Top > of my > >>>>>> list is: > >>>>>> - SR-IOV > >>>>>> - NPV > >>>>>> - VFIO > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These things could be handled on cluster level - hypervisors need to > >>>>>> have the same hardware configuration anyway. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, I think its time to add official support for OpenVswitch? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Are you looking for a specific functionality that is available via > >>>>> OpenVswitch (=OVS)? > >>>>> also we have the Neutron integration where we use OVS. > >>>> I think its sufficient to say OVS is a 'real' modern switch while > plain > >>>> ol' linux bridge is not (so much any more). Of curse, maybe > implementing > >>>> other things like macvtap and / or SR-IOV achieves just the same thing > >>>> (at least for me, as I then mange vlans/trunks and QoS, Spanning Tree > >>>> ect. on my switches). > >>>> > >>>> I know you can point on OpenStack integration because you get those > >>>> features for 'free' (see Ceph). But what about users like me who do > not > >>>> wish / can / should implement the whole OpenStack but rather want to > run > >>>> 'plain' oVirt? > >>> that's why we added in 3.5 a standalone, pre-configured, neutron > virtual > >>> appliance so you won't need "all of openstack"? > >> Witch is certainly nice to have. But this is not the point. IMHO storage > >> and networking are core functions for a virtualization platform. And > >> such a platform will need to reflect the the progress made in general > >> and in particular by the hypervisor monitor (libvirt). > >> I am no developer and can hardly estimate the coding effort and do not > >> want you to redo already working things. But at least in case of Ceph > >> there is the API from libvirt, this is true for all the other things I > >> mentioned, in my naive view they are all variations of the hostusb hook. > >> Certainly I can deploy OVS myself and manage it from CLI, witch is what > >> I do now. > >> Could you share how you set it up, i.e., how you map networks to ovs > >> and everything that you configure? Depending on the size, making a > >> vdsm configurator for it would not be that difficult (and the fine > >> tunning could come with hooks). > Hello Antoni, > I see this was very misleading, sorry. With the phrase 'witch is what > I do now' I literally meant 'right now' witch is not (yet) oVirt/vdsm > but plain libvirt / virsh / virt-manager. > > Since libvirt supports OVS directly; I just use <virtualport > type='openvswitch'/> in my network xml; then define VLANs and QoS with > ovs-vsctl cli. So I am used to OVS management and the flexibility it > offers. > I was also trying to mangle things in oVirt - but I could not get OVS to > work with oVirt managed bridges and gave up (since I cannot use such > 'hacks' in production environments, company and my own policy). > > Thanks! > > PS: I hope I made myself clear in my last mails, OVS is not the 'killer' > feature witch decides whatever I deploy oVirt or not. Linux bridge and > libvirt network QoS are well tested. But I will surely miss some things > later on I cannot do directly. What I do with it and what I use it > currently for - please refer to my mail to Livnat. > > > > >> But in the end, I would very much like to do this via one integrated > >> GUI, this is why I deploy oVirt (witch I see as a open source > >> counterpart to EXi. Esp. the concept of one engine for management - but > >> not critical for running my VMs.) > >> Please allow me a 'heretic' question, will oVirt make itself obsoleted > >> in the future because all of the core functionality is moved to an > >> external provider? Is it better for my use case (small/medium business > >> and not in the telco sector) to deploy OpenStack in the first place and > >> not to use oVirt at all? ATM OpenStack seems to me like the literal > >> sledgehammer to crack a nut. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> < > http://www.dict.cc/englisch-deutsch/to+take+a+sledgehammer+to+crack+a+nut.html > > > >> > >>>> I think this might not be a desirable way to add / modernize features > as > >>>> it creates a huge overhead (at least in my use case, medium business. > I > >>>> did this once for Glance 'just' to get a way to more easily handle > >>>> import / export of image files, now I need to implement Neutron 'just' > >>>> to get OVS?). > >>>> > >>>> Don't get me wrong - OpenStack integration is a wonderful thing witch > >>>> leaves room for expansion - later on. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 12.09.2014 14:23, Itamar Heim wrote: > >>>>>>> With oVirt 3.5 nearing GA, time to ask for "what do you want to > see in > >>>>>>> oVirt 3.6"? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Itamar > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Users mailing list > >>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org > >>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >>>>>>> > >> -- > >> Daniel Helgenberger > >> m box bewegtbild GmbH > >> > >> P: +49/30/2408781-22 > >> F: +49/30/2408781-10 > >> > >> ACKERSTR. 19 > >> D-10115 BERLIN > >> > >> > >> www.m-box.de www.monkeymen.tv > >> > >> Geschäftsführer: Martin Retschitzegger / Michaela Göllner > >> Handeslregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg / HRB 112767 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Users mailing list > >> Users@ovirt.org > >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > > -- > Daniel Helgenberger > m box bewegtbild GmbH > > P: +49/30/2408781-22 > F: +49/30/2408781-10 > > ACKERSTR. 19 > D-10115 BERLIN > > > www.m-box.de www.monkeymen.tv > > Geschäftsführer: Martin Retschitzegger / Michaela Göllner > Handeslregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg / HRB 112767 > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users