On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco <sgr...@essiprojects.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren <bkor...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> VMs are not >> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y > > > Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH > points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I can't > argue with that, what I do can say is that "non-customers" (most of > companies out there using vsphere or hyper-v) feel dissapointed towards this > solution for things like this one (for this case, 2 of my customers are > missing this, we are deploying RHV to one of them this week). > > I don't see how this lack of flexibility is something good, and so far from > my experience with customers which I'm trying to convince to start using > RHV, when they finally do agree to start with one or two servers (following > the RHCI roadmap evolution to the hybrid cloud), they see things like this > and dismiss this solution sooner than later. > > Anyways, question has been answer "yes, is technically possible but by > design it is not going to happen",
Not sure how you got this impression from current discussion. On the contrary - people are working on this, and it was planned to be completed in 4.0, but eventually postponed. Best, > and I wouldn't like to convert this > thread or abuse your kindness deviating the subject :) > > Thx again guys for the help, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Didi _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users