Thanks, I'm not so familiar with the hosted-engine --upgrade-appliance flow, can someone from the list that is familiar with such flow assist?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:10 PM, <spfma.t...@e.mail.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I installed my nodes with the latest packages available in repositories. > Then I installed the self-hosted engine on one of them, created the cluster > and added the second node. > > When I encountered these network config problems and saw your answer, I > thougt it was time to update some packages to get corrections. > > So I just runned a "yum update" on the nodes and rebooted them. > > Then I put the engine in global maintenance mode and tried "hosted-engine > --upgrade-appliance" on the node hosting it. > > But it failed returning me this cluster version error. > > The engine's about windows says "Software Version:4.2.0.2-1.el7.centos" > > And for the hosts : > OS Version:RHEL - 7 - 4.1708.el7.centos > OS Description:CentOS Linux 7 (Core) > Kernel Version:3.10.0 - 693.17.1.el7.x86_64 > KVM Version:2.9.0 - 16.el7_4.13.1 > LIBVIRT Version:libvirt-3.2.0-14.el7_4.7 > VDSM Version:vdsm-4.20.9.3-1.el7.centos > SPICE Version:0.12.8 - 2.el7.1 > GlusterFS Version:[N/A] > CEPH Version:librbd1-0.94.5-2.el7 > > Regards > > > > > Le 08-Feb-2018 09:59:32 +0100, mbur...@redhat.com a écrit: > > Not sure i understand from which version you trying to upgrade and what is > the exact upgrade flow, if i got it correctly, it is seems that you > upgraded the hosts to 4.2, but engine still 4.1? > What exactly the upgrade steps, please explain the flow., what have you > done after upgrading the hosts? to what version? > > Cheers) > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:00 PM, <spfma.t...@e.mail.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Thanks a lot for your answer. >> >> I applied some updates at node level, but I forgot to upgrade the engine ! >> >> When I try to do so I get a strange error : "Cluster PROD is at version >> 4.2 which is not supported by this upgrade flow. Please fix it before >> upgrading." >> >> Here are the installed packets on my nodes : >> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.2.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64 >> ovirt-imageio-common-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.2.3-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.9.1-1.el7.noarch >> ovirt-setup-lib-1.1.4-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-release42-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-imageio-daemon-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-host-dependencies-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 >> ovirt-host-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 >> ovirt-host-deploy-1.7.0-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-provider-ovn-driver-1.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20171219.1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-vmconsole-host-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch >> cockpit-ovirt-dashboard-0.11.3-0.1.el7.centos.noarch >> ovirt-vmconsole-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch >> >> What I am supposed to do ? I see no newer packages available. >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> Le 07-Feb-2018 13:23:43 +0100, mbur...@redhat.com a écrit: >> >> Hi >> >> This is a bug and it was already fixed in 4.2.1.1-0.1.el7 - >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528906 >> >> The no default route bug was fixed in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ >> show_bug.cgi?id=1477589 >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:15 PM, <spfma.t...@e.mail.fr> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> I am experiencing a new problem : when I try to modify something in the >>> network setup on the second node (added to the cluster after installing the >>> engine on the other one) using the Engine GUI, I get the following error >>> when validating : >>> >>> must match "^\b((25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\ >>> d|\d?\d)\_){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)" >>> Attribut : ipConfiguration.iPv4Addresses[0].gateway >>> >>> Moreover, on the general status of ther server, I have a "Host has no >>> default route" alert. >>> >>> The ovirtmgmt network has a defined gateway of course, and the storage >>> network has none because it is not required. Both server have the same >>> setup, with different addresses of course :-) >>> >>> I have not been able to find anything useful in the logs. >>> >>> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> FreeMail powered by mail.fr >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Michael Burman >> >> Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com> >> >> mbur...@redhat.com M: 0545355725 IM: mburman >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> FreeMail powered by mail.fr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > > -- > > Michael Burman > > Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > mbur...@redhat.com M: 0545355725 IM: mburman > > > > ------------------------------ > FreeMail powered by mail.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Michael Burman Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> mbur...@redhat.com M: 0545355725 IM: mburman <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users