Do you remember what version you used at the time? Because I tried it with
2.0.6, 2.0.0 and 1.8.13 and the results were pretty much the same in all of
them.

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Stoll, Matthias <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Gilad.
>
> I will try to have a look into it by begin of next week as my time is
> limited this week due to open business projects.
> The sample code worked when I opened the issue. Will check with most
> recent PDFBox - and see what our developers say regarding our production
> code.
>
> I will come back to you.
>
> Kind regards,
>  Matthias
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilad Denneboom [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 17:41
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Adding a Redaction annotation (without applying it)
>
> No, it's not working, either. Tried loading Multipage_Sample_annots_
> square.xfdf
> and got this:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: Error: End-of-File,
> expected line
>     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.BaseParser.readLine(
> BaseParser.java:1145)
>     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.COSParser.parseHeader(
> COSParser.java:1995)
>     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.COSParser.parseFDFHeader(
> COSParser.java:1977)
>     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.FDFParser.parse(FDFParser.java:158)
>     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.fdf.FDFDocument.load(FDFDocument.
> java:184)
>     at RedactClip.main(RedactClip.java:17)
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Stoll, Matthias <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I would recommend to start with the sample XFDF as provided with my
> > initial JIRA issue.
> > This is only to ensure that PDFBox reads the correct XML metadata it
> > might need to process.
> > Does this work for you with the current PDFBox version?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilad Denneboom [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 17:13
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Adding a Redaction annotation (without applying it)
> >
> > I tried the same with an FDF file. This time it was read successfully,
> > but the annotations were not added:
> >
> > Jun 22, 2017 5:08:46 PM org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.fdf.FDFAnnotation
> > create
> > WARNING: Unknown or unsupported annotation type 'Redact'
> > Jun 22, 2017 5:08:46 PM org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.fdf.FDFAnnotation
> > create
> > WARNING: Unknown or unsupported annotation type 'Popup'
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Gilad Denneboom <
> > [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've encountered my first stumble-block... When I try to import my
> > > Acrobat-generated XFDF file I get this exception:
> > >
> > > Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: Error: Header
> > > doesn't contain versioninfo
> > >     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.FDFParser.parse(FDFParser.java:160)
> > >     at org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.fdf.FDFDocument.load(FDFDocument.j
> > > ava:184)
> > >     at RedactClip.main(RedactClip.java:15)
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > PS. I'm using PDFBox 2.0.6
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Gilad Denneboom <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Certainly! I'll give it a try and will post any updates here...
> > >> Thanks for your help so far.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Stoll, Matthias
> > >> <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Gilad,
> > >>>
> > >>> Exactly - and there is a small code sample already from which you
> > >>> can start (XFDFStamper.java)
> > >>>
> > >>> PDFBox team has improved their support of XFDF after that call and
> > >>> we will try to contribute a bit in the future as there are still
> > >>> some smaller issues/ restrictions. But we can already use it quite
> > good.
> > >>>
> > >>> Is this code sample good enough for you to start with?
> > >>>
> > >>> Kind regards,
> > >>>  Matthias
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Gilad Denneboom [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >>> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 12:04
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Subject: Re: Adding a Redaction annotation (without applying it)
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, I'll be very happy to get some sample code... Is it related
> > >>> to this issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3164
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks in advance!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Stoll, Matthias <
> > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi Gilad,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Yes - by "stamping" I mean applying the redactions (i.e. texts,
> > >>> > boxes, arrows - everything that XFDF allows) onto the PDF and
> > >>> > then exporting a new one.
> > >>> > We do this as part of a rendering component for electronic files.
> > >>> > Therefore we take 2 file:
> > >>> > 1) the original PDF (unmodified)
> > >>> > 2) the annotation file as XFDF
> > >>> > Then we merge them together on the fly and give it to the
> > >>> > viewing component as a readonly new temporary PDF document.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > XFDF is supported by Adobe and other viewers, i.e. Qoppa viewer
> > >>> > and the Foxit Web Viewer also directly deal with XFDF as
> > >>> > separate
> > files.
> > >>> > You give them both files and they merge it for display on the fly.
> > >>> > When using PDF.js as a viewer or another component which
> > >>> > natively does not support XFDF annotations, you might go the
> > >>> > same way as we do - render on the fly.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > If you need some sample code ("XFDF stamping") to start with, we
> > >>> > might be happy to help.
> > >>> > Tilman and the PDFBox team were so kind to help us initially
> > >>> > here, so we might help you now and give some knowhow back.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Kind regards,
> > >>> >  Matthias
> > >>> >
> > >>> > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > From: Gilad Denneboom [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >>> > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 10:53
> > >>> > To: [email protected]
> > >>> > Subject: Re: Adding a Redaction annotation (without applying it)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Hi Matthias,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks for the info.
> > >>> > What do you mean exactly by "stamping" the XFDF file, though? Do
> > >>> > you mean just import it? Does that actually apply the redactions?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Gilad
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Stoll, Matthias
> > >>> > <[email protected]>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi Gilad,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > One approach to do this is by forming redactions based on XFDF.
> > >>> > > If you want to apply the XFDF based redactions permanently,
> > >>> > > you can
> > >>> "stamp"
> > >>> > > it later into the PDF.
> > >>> > > Both is possible by using PDFBox.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Kind regards,
> > >>> > >  Matthias
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > > From: Gilad Denneboom [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >>> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 09:47
> > >>> > > To: [email protected]
> > >>> > > Subject: Adding a Redaction annotation (without applying it)
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Hi all,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Does anyone know if PDFBox supports adding Redaction
> > >>> > > annotations? If so, is it a documented feature? Are there any
> > >>> > > code samples I could
> > >>> use?
> > >>> > > I'm not talking about applying them (actually redaction the
> > >>> > > underlying contents), just creating them... Hopefully it's
> > possible.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Regards, Gilad.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
  • Re: Adding... Gilad Denneboom
    • RE: A... Stoll, Matthias
      • R... Gilad Denneboom
        • ... Stoll, Matthias
          • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Stoll, Matthias
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Stoll, Matthias
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Stoll, Matthias
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Stoll, Matthias
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Mehlhose, Frank (Application Business Services - Public Sector)
            • ... Gilad Denneboom
            • ... Gilad Denneboom

Reply via email to