On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 11:20 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > On 07/09/2010 08:27 AM, Andrew Kennedy wrote: > > On 9 July 2010 12:50, Bruno Matos<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:22 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > >> > >>> The only options would be what we have, or have an ACL policy that sets > >>> the rate for a specific user or > >>> group of users, (which we don't have). Best for Bruno to clarify > >>> requirements / question. > >>> > >>> Carl. > >>> > >> ACL policy sounds really good! Its possible to make some changes to ACL > >> plug-in to support rate control, in Kbps, without packet loss? > >> > > I'm not sure ACLs are the right place for this, as you end up > > conflating security (authorisation) policy with operational (resource > > usage) policy. > > > > Andrew. > > > > Could be debated either way. For example, can do ACL to set the max > queue size > a user can create, and what types of queues. Setting the rate of data he > can send > falls pretty much into the same category would be my view. what do > others think? > > Carl. >
It's my opinion, but if ACL is just for access control, maybe could be a QoS component for the kind of things you are describing. If there are already some other functionality in that module, I think that doesn't hurt to give it a little more with a refactoring in mind for the near future. Kindly regards and, once again, thank you a lot! Bruno Matos --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
