On 07/09/2012 02:58 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
You may be familiar[1] with the c++ test utilities qpid-send,
qpid-receive and the qpid-cpp-benchmark script that harnesses them
for simple performance testing.
Pavel Moravec has been good enough to contribute a python port of
these utilities[2] and a modification (and rename) for
qpid-cpp-benchmark[3] to allow the script to drive either version of
the utilities (in any combination). (Thanks, Pavel!)
There are a couple of questions I wanted to ask before getting these
contributions into the tree.
(i) Where should the python utilities live? I was thinking about
creating a 'perf' directory under examples (alongside 'api) and
putting them in there. Though they aren't restricted to perf
testing, that would see to at least be obvious location).
If they're performance tests, why place them under examples? I would
putting them under a sibling directory named util would be more
logical, maybe util/perf.
They aren't simply performance tests. They aren't really intended as
examples either though, but general testing utilities.
My only reason for adding them under examples was that it seemed like
the closest existing area for code using the messaging API. I'd be fine
with adding a new directory for them however.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
