(A little trouble with my list subscription, so I'm using nabble to reply.)
"I would have these categories on the front page in some way (with more detail on each and indeed on each aspect or sub-component) available via links." This suggests that the categories you listed are not now present on the front page. I'm confused because I think they are (APIs, Brokers, Proton). Is the trouble that some of Proton's APIs are mixed into the API group? I think a user-centric view focuses on the immediate thing people use, which is an API or a server. Those are the independently usable parts, and so they should be first class in the logical presentation. Proton doesn't fit in this scheme. Proton doesn't fit because it's a container of multiple end-user parts, just as our cpp (broker, messaging api) and java (broker, jms) trees are. "Much of the other stuff on the right hand side of the page I would move off the front page. While I see the value of having some easy links, I think it is a little noisy and I think it could be more clearly done in the context of the different components." I could see doing that. Note, though, that the stuff on the right does not naturally hang off the categories you described (for example, "other client libraries") because they are really operational things, and are therefore tied to how our source modules are organized. To map them onto proton+otherclientlibs+brokers would be very synthetic. Justin -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Website-update-tp7590445p7590469.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
