No.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, "Darryl L. Pierce" <dpie...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Gordon was installing the qpid-cpp 0.24 sources [1], which failed due to
> the LICENSE file for the Perl bindings not being present. After filling
> out a JIRA for this [2] and a comment from Gordon, it seemed to me that
> the qpid-cpp sources probably shouldn't even include the Perl, or other
> language, bindings. Instead it should probably only carry the C++ client
> and server code, and leave the bindings to the monolithic tarball that's
> produced instead.
>
> So my question is this, should we trim what's included in the qpid-cpp
> sources to be only the C++ client and server code, leaving the language
> bindings for the separate source tarballs?
>
> [ ] Yes, remove the language bindings from qpid-cpp-${VER}
> [X ] No, leave the language bindings in qpid-cpp-${VER}
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/qpid/0.24/qpid-cpp-0.24.tar.gz
> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5128
>
> --
> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
