Yes
Darryl L. Pierce wrote
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:02:24AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> Gordon was installing the qpid-cpp 0.24 sources [1], which failed due to
>> the LICENSE file for the Perl bindings not being present. After filling
>> out a JIRA for this [2] and a comment from Gordon, it seemed to me that
>> the qpid-cpp sources probably shouldn't even include the Perl, or other
>> language, bindings. Instead it should probably only carry the C++ client
>> and server code, and leave the bindings to the monolithic tarball that's
>> produced instead.
>>
>> So my question is this, should we trim what's included in the qpid-cpp
>> sources to be only the C++ client and server code, leaving the language
>> bindings for the separate source tarballs?
>>
>> [ ] Yes, remove the language bindings from qpid-cpp-${VER}
>> [ ] No, leave the language bindings in qpid-cpp-${VER}
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/qpid/0.24/qpid-cpp-0.24.tar.gz
>> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5128
>
> To clarify, since it may not be clear, I'm not asking to remove the
> bindings from the qpid-${VER} file (the "monolithic tarball" mentioned
> above), but removing them from the qpid-cpp tarball.
>
> --
> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
>
>
> attachment0 (205 bytes)
> <http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/attachment/7598082/0/attachment0>
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Removing-the-bindings-from-qpid-cpp-source-tarball-tp7598078p7598157.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
