On 17 September 2014 09:25, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to >> call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new >> JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion. >> >> This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed >> as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following >> subtree are under consideration for migation at this time: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/ >> >> I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on >> it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we >> can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a >> Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there >> as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache >> mirror things to Github. >> >> Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in >> question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any >> discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on >> Friday, >> i.e. 72hrs. >> > > I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git > is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense > raising a barrier to new contributors. > > Just to be certain, is your reply to be taken as +1 vote Gordon?
Robbie
