On 09/18/2014 10:07 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 17 September 2014 09:25, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/16/2014 05:35 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hello all,
I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread, and have decided just to
call a vote on the subject. I would like to migrate the repo for the new
JMS client work to use Git rather than Subversion.
This wont affect the rest of the Qpid codebase, though it could be viewed
as a test for any such move in future. Only the bits in the following
subtree are under consideration for migation at this time:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/jms/
I believe it would make things easier for those of us currently working on
it, and ease future usage of things like the Github integration we
can/should have Apache infra enable. For anyone still wanting to use a
Subversion client to check things out, there will still be an option there
as e.g. Github repos can also be checked out with svn clients, and Apache
mirror things to Github.
Please cast your votes. Even if you don't intend to work on the code in
question, please vote or at least contribute your thoughts to any
discussion that pops up. I will tally the votes after this point on
Friday,
i.e. 72hrs.
I'm in favour of those doing the work deciding what suits them best. Git
is now well enough established that switching isn't in any real sense
raising a barrier to new contributors.
Just to be certain, is your reply to be taken as +1 vote Gordon?
It's more in the category of 'contributing my thoughts' :-) I'm not
going to be immediately involved, so I feel odd voting on it and since I
don't think you are short of votes, I'm just saying explicitly that what
you decide is alright with me. (as opposed to being silent which might
be interpreted differently).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
