On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
This has come up tangentially in a couple of threads now, and there seems
to be at least tacit agreement that the plural doesn't make sense anymore
now that we've seen how integrations/extensions will work.
I'll be posting an alpha later today, but before that I'd like to do the
reactors->reactor rename of the python package to keep everything
consistent. This stuff hasn't been in a release yet, so I don't think there
are any backwards compatibility issues, but if this will cause problems,
please follow up and I will create an alias.
Just a suggestion, but what about proton.reactive? Perhaps proton.
handlers could then be proton.reactive.handlers, which would make the
relationship clearer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
