+1 ... if we remove this and proton-jms, I presume the plan is to remove contrib altogether - our history suggests that "contrib" sources are mostly neglected after they are added to the codebase, so I'd be keen to try to avoid them in the future :-)
-- Rob On 26 April 2016 at 18:37, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing > 'proton/contrib/proton-hawtdispatch' module. > > hawtdispatch itself doesn't appear to be seeing any development these > days, with only a handful of commits in the last couple years on > master, none in approaching a year, and the referenced website > appearing to be down. The proton-hawtdispatch module hasn't seen a > meaningful (non-version) commit in a couple years, and is itself using > an old release of hawtdispatch. The statistics repository.apache.org > gives for maven central usage suggest little use, with perhaps average > of 40 downloads a month from 10 IPs. > > As the related project appears inactive, nobody is really maintaining > it, and few appear to be using it, I think it should be removed. > > Thoughts? > > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > >
