On 29/06/16 22:19, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
As a bit of a tangent, I'm not actually the biggest fan of 'authenticatePeer: no' since it doesnt actually stop the router offering mechnisms that do authentication and then fail when used.
Yes, 'requireSasl' might have been a bit more precise. Even if sasl is required, anonymous can still be allowed - that would be controlled via the mech_list in the sasl conf file.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
