+1 for migration from svn to git I would use qpid-java-broker as a name for the repo, as it is a bit shorter than qpid-broker-for-java. I'd also be Ok with 'qpid-broker-for-java' as a name for the repo. In general I prefer full names over the abbreviations or truncations of the words. Mixing abbreviation with full words looks a bit unusual to me. Thus, I would vote against 'qpid-broker-j'.
Kind Regards, Alex On 27 March 2017 at 14:15, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > I like qpid-broker-j best of the alternatives proposed. I think > qpid-broker alone will cause a little confusion. > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 27 March 2017 at 12:35, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On 27 March 2017 at 10:47, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On 27 March 2017 at 11:31, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi all > > > >> > > > >> Now the Qpid Broker for Java and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client are > > > >> separated [1]/[2], I'd like to propose the final two remaining Qpid > > > >> components are migrated from SVN to GIT. > > > >> > > > >> * Qpid Broker for Java > > > >> * Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client > > > >> > > > >> This will give us a consistent, Git based, version control approach > > > >> across the whole project and therefore a simpler 'getting involved' > > > >> story that should benefit the community as a whole. > > > >> > > > >> The source code migration will maintain source code history, > including > > > >> existing release branches and tags made since r1673693/QPID-6481 [3] > > > >> > > > >> The intention would be for all future releases to be made from git. > > > >> This would include any future maintenance releases from 6.0.x and > > > >> 6.1.x (which would remain combined broker/client releases). > > > >> > > > >> Qpid Broker for Java: > > > >> > > > >> Current SVN location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/java/ > > > >> Proposed GIT repo: git://git.apache.org/qpid-broker > > > >> <http://git.apache.org/qpid-broker-for-java.git>-for-java.git > > > >> <http://git.apache.org/qpid-broker-for-java.git> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have to make the repo name quite so wordy? :-) git:// > > > > git.apache.org/qpid-broker.git would work for me. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> The existing GIT mirror at git://git.apache.org/qpid-java.git would > > > cease. > > > >> > > > >> Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client: > > > >> > > > >> Current SVN location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/ > > > >> asf/qpid/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x/ > > > >> Proposed GIT repo: git://git.apache.org/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x.git > > > >> > > > >> The existing GIT mirror at git://git.apache.org/qpid-jms- > amqp-0-x.git > > > >> would become the 'live' repo.. > > > >> > > > >> Thoughts? > > > >> > > > > > > > > No objections on the client side, and OK on the broker side with the > > > > proviso that I'd prefer a shorter repo name :-) > > > > > > > > -- Rob > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> [1] http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-the-AMQP-0-x- > > > >> client-from-the-Qpid-for-Java-7-0-release-td7657770.html > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7622 > > > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6481 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm also not hugely fond of 'qpid-broker-for-java' as a repo name. > > > Using only 'qpid-broker' doesn't necessarily do a great job of > > > signalling which broker it contains, though the contents would make it > > > pretty obvious and seeing that the cpp broker is in 'qpid-cpp' isn't > > > much of a stretch or that surprising (particularly as its been there a > > > while now, and I doubt we will separate those bits further). Adding > > > '-j' might be another option though. > > > > > > > > The above was literally my reasoning as I considered what name I would > give > > it... I'd also be happy with qpid-broker-j however that's not what we > call > > it in maven, etc (though I wouldn't be hugely upset to rename it > > consistently). > > > > > > > Regardless which of these its called, happy to proceed and will be > > > glad to see them moved to git. > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > -- Rob > > > > > > > Side note, git.apache.org doesn't actually hold the live repos, just > > > mirrors. The actual writable repos would be at > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/<name>.git > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
