Hi Alex, Thank you for the email,
I'm using the below version: qpid-java-6.1.4 Berkeley DB Java Edition - 5.0.73 Please let me know the correct combination. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Oleksandr Rudyy <oru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Girish, > > What version of bdb je library are you using? > > 6.x versions of Qpid Broker are based on bdb je version 5.0.104 due to > Oracle license change. > > Master and new 7.x versions of the Broker will be based new bdb je versions > ( 7.3.7 and above), as Oracle started to distribute je with dual licenses - > one of which is Apache license. > > I am guessing that you are trying to start 6.x version of Broker with bd je > 7.3.x. Please, use je version 5.0.104. > > Kind Regards, > Alex > > > On 10 July 2017 at 14:03, Chandrashekar, Girish <gchandrashe...@wabtec.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > Could you please help me to setup Qpid High Availability functionality. > > > > > > I am referring the below link, but I am not successful to setup; in fact > I > > got the "422 - je.cleaner.adjustUtilization is not a valid BDBJE > > environment parameter" error and also I had lost the files and folders > > present in my C:\ after this error. I tried the same in 2 virtual > machines > > and also in my local machine same result 😞 > > > > > > https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-java-6.1.4/java- > > broker/book/Java-Broker-High-Availability-CreatingGroup.html > > > > > > Can someone let me know the root cause and also please help me to setup > > the High Availability functionality. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Girish LC > > > > 09886521716 > > > > This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended > > recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, > proprietary > > or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, > > dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this > > e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this > > email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the > > original. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, > nor > > anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic > > signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this > > message. > > > -- Regards, Girish LC #09886521716
