Hi Gordon, hi Chuck, thank you for the information.
I tested using Proton Python clients (python3) version 0.16 and qpidd c++ version 1.36.0. I will take the newest versions of both and retest. Will come back with the results. Thank you, Andreas On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Chuck Rolke <cro...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gordon Sim" <g...@redhat.com> > > To: users@qpid.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 3:36:37 PM > > Subject: Re: C++ Broker Performance with large messages > > > > On 20/02/18 16:51, andi welchlin wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I tested throughput of the Qpid C++ Broker (compiled as Release). > > > > > > It was tested on a virtual machine with 15 GB RAM. > > > > > > First I sent a 100 MB message into a persistent queue. From sender to > > > receiver it took 16 seconds for one message. > > > > > > Afterwards I sent a 300 MB message, this one took 125 seconds. So this > is > > > not 3 times more (as I would have expected but 7,5 times more). > > > > > > Any suggestions how to improve throughput? > > > > > > Do you have an idea why 300 MB is 7,5 times slower than 100 MB? > > > > Is this over AMQP 1.0? Also what clients have you tested with and is > > there any differences there? > > > > Some AMQP 1.0 qpid-proton -based sending clients before 0.19 suffered from > large > output buffer issues. See https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/PROTON-1687 > and related issues. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > >
