On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:23 PM VERMEULEN Olivier <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Yes the waypoint address (in from broker) is using a multicast
> distribution.
> Unfortunately skipping the broker is not an option for us right now.
> Our whole architecture relies on the broker to guarantee that no messages
> will ever be lost...
> For information we're asking for a quick workaround because we're facing
> this problem on a client production environment...
>

Are you looking for a patch you can apply locally to work around your issue?


>
> Thanks,
> Olivier
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Giusti <[email protected]>
> Sent: mardi 29 octobre 2019 18:07
> To: users <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: multicast without consumers
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:54 AM jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello Gordon,
> >
> > We debugged the dispatch router, and fell on the code which releases
> > undeliverable messages(
> > https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/blob/1.5.0/src/router_core/tra
> > nsfer.c#L869
> > ).
> >
> > Check the comment on line 879. It states that if the distribution is
> > multicast, the credit will be replenished after the release. The issue
> > that introduced this behavior is:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1012
> >
> >
> Is the waypoint address (in from broker) using multicast distribution?
>
> The router treats multicast addresses like topics - you can publish to a
> multicast address (topic) regardless of the presence of consumers.  That's
> the reason credit is being replenished even when no consumers are present.
>
> That's probably what's happening here - broker sends first queued message
> to the router, which attempts to send it to the topic.   Since there are no
> consumers (and the message is sent from the broker as unsettled) the
> router cannot deliver it so it returns the released status.  The released
> status causes the broker to redeliver the message. Repeat.
>
>
>
>
> > In fact, we need an urgent fix/workaround for this. Perhaps there is a
> > quick workaround, awaiting the full analysis of this problem?
> >
> >
> As a work around can you avoid sending these multicast messages to the
> broker queue?  In other words send them directly to the router instead of
> using a waypoint?
>
>
>
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Cheers,
> > Jeremy
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> --
> -K
> *******************************
> This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only. It may
> contain proprietary material or confidential information. If you are not
> the intended recipient you are not authorized to distribute, copy or use
> this e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot guarantee that it is
> virus free and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising
> from its use. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify
> immediately the sender and delete the original email received, any
> attachments and all copies from your system.
>

Reply via email to