Yes it is, fingers forget to abbreviate :) I
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 08:02, Dondorp, Erwin <erwin.dond...@cgi.com.invalid> wrote: > > Just in case someone wants to apply this in their situation... > This seems to be the proper variable: export PN_TRACE_FRM=1 > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > Verzonden: maandag 27 juni 2022 11:08 > Aan: users <users@qpid.apache.org> > Onderwerp: Re: what is address "autoLink/0" ? > > > EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you > trust the sender and know the content is safe. > EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE: Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce > jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous ayez > l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre. > > I think you mean Example 16, or perhaps you are looking at a different > version. In any case, autolinks are mentioned in various other places in the > router docs but are most specifically covered in the 'brokered messaging' > section, since if you are messaging routing with a broker you are likely to > use autolinks to do so, e.g: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-dispatch-1.19.0/user-guide/index.html*how-router-enables-brokered-messaging-qdr__;Iw!!AaIhyw!tdZV1LvqmGpvfHmSUOEUHp1JQ3Hk03WwtVeWLuyGWOXtyDw3UHRr4c3O_Gu5PGpPGCBDZH1Qt45kHR4iAZxG88-b6g$ > > The error message you pasted looks to be the combination of description from > the link error the broker emitted, and some operational description from the > router. The broker refused a link, saying simply "AMQ119010: source address > does not exist", whilst the router added the rest locally to outline the > specific link and connection the failure is related to. > > The "autoLink/0" is going to be either the generated figurative or actual > underlying link name given to the link that failed to be created, which from > the details I'd guess is the first configured autolink trying to consume > messages from the broker, on connection 'myconectionname' configured to the > broker. > > What exactly is going on will be visible in a protocol trace though, which > since both sides are using a version of proton can be enabled on either end > (or both) by setting env variable PN_TRACE_FRAME=1. > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 at 00:27, Dondorp, Erwin <erwin.dond...@cgi.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > After some successful tests with link-routing in an "edge+interior" setup, > > I'm now trying out message-routing. > > There is a simple client on one end of the network and an Artemis broker on > > the other end. > > > > The edge router that the broker connects to has the following error message: > > "Auto Link Activation Failed. AMQ119010: source address does not exist > > 'autoLink/0' on connection myconectionname" > > So, the broker is refusing that address. That makes sense because purposely > > only some known addresses are allowed. > > > > I never asked for the address "autoLink/0". > > Also, 'autoLink/0' is visible in example 17 of the Qpid Router manual, but > > there does not seem to be any further explanation about it. > > > > Can someone please explain this effect? > > > > thx! > > Erwin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
