>> I like how you show one way of converting a match to an object, and then >> show a better way. What I did not like very much is how the first way is >> really verbose and made me question whether to read on, and in >> retrospect the way using match isn't much less verbose. Wouldn't a >> simple (apply on-action (rest a-match)) work? > > Fortunately, `match' provides some features that make this much nicer. > Here's a new version (untested):
Ok, second version of parse-irc has been updated to use Sam's version instead. Thanks! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
