Fwiw I did also look at Cairngorm before I ended up using Crux. iirc I think there might be some ADDED and REMOVED events for the views support that probably need to be addressed if you are using the views support. Crux has a stage events emulator that does that for addedToStage/removedFromStage, but ADDED and REMOVED are more about child/parent changes than about 'stage' I think.
I used Crux mainly because I knew I could get it to work without any problems, and because I had other more critical issues to address (getting the Adobe rss syndication lib working, and in particular, the way it was being used in the app ) On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:09 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Yes, if you want to emulate Cairngorm, get the source and build it with > Flex so you know you have all of the pieces. > > > > Then, back up the source in case you need to go back and start replacing > the import flash.*.* with Royale imports. For example: > > > > Import flash.events.EventDispatcher; > > > > Would be replaced by > > > > Import org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher; > > > > > > If you have a question about what class to use as a replacement, ask on > d...@royale.apache.org. Then try to compile with Royale and see what > kinds of errors you get. If you don’t need the functionality in the code > that has a compile error, one option is to comment it out. For example, I > just emulated WebService and commented out all of the flash.xml.XMLDocument > support because I don’t think many people used it. > > > > Good luck, > > -Alex > > > > *From: *Takeshita Shoichiro <jl03...@gmail.com> > *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> > *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 8:37 PM > *To: *"users@royale.apache.org" <users@royale.apache.org> > *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm framework > > > > Alex, I have a question re Cairngorm emulation? > > > > I think I need to put the Cairngorm source in the Royale project src > folder. Then, what should I do? > > > > Thanks for your advice. > > > > 2019年10月14日(月) 16:47 Takeshita Shoichiro <jl03...@gmail.com>: > > Carlos, thanks. > > > > I am very glad to hear that. > > > > Then, no hesitation to use Crux. > > > > 2019年10月14日(月) 16:43 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > > Hi Takeshita, > > > > I'll try to answer your questions > > > > El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 8:08, Takeshita Shoichiro (<jl03...@gmail.com>) > escribió: > > > > 1. Does Apache Royale contain almost the ready-to-use emulation code for > Swiz? Or do we need more work for Apache Royale SDK? > > > > Yes. Swiz is ported to Royale (not emulated) and called Crux. So Crux is > ready to use for you right now. No more work are needed for Royale in that > line unless you report some bug around it. > > > > 2. Is the use of Jewel required? Or is it possible also with existing > MXML code? > > > > > > Jewel is not required. In Royale you are not tied to only one UI Set like > in Flex. You have several ones to choose. You can use emulation components > for MX/Spark, Basic, Jewel, MDL.... > > > > If you use MXRoyale, you'll get a near 0% code changes, but your > application will look black/white unless you try to improve the look and > feel. > > In exchange, Jewel will requiere you to recode you visual code, what means > in most cases very easy changes, but is not as direct as MXRoyale, in > exchange you get a more good looking interface since Jewel is crafted with > look and feel and themes in mind. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1858a2db58ac4f0aec6108d752b358af%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068802551056250&sdata=IEzDj%2F6qvbZShnRtRGg%2FG9ZPrAbDLkNBRDk5cOnL1pw%3D&reserved=0> > > > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 >
