I still get the same error.

Can you advise - if i use the new http soap consumer, will it be compatible
(standart) to use an old http endpoint with a provider role & soap=true?

Thanks.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:

> If the wsdl indicates "" for the soap action header, the http provider
> should use that value.
> If your web service expects a non empty value, you need to fill it
> with something valid in the wsdl.
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 14:16, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Nop, still get the same fault (no SOAPAction header!). Maybe i need to
> set
> > the soap action attribute in the wsdl?
> >
> > Currently it's set to "".
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:15 PM, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The operation is conveyed on camel using the "jbi.operation" header on
> >>> the exchange, which value must be the string representation of the
> >>> qname for the operation.
> >>> Try with:
> >>>   exchange.setProperty("jbi.operation", new QName("http://prd";,
> >>> "getForcastPerLocation").toString());
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 13:24, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > Ok, i added the below bolded line to my camel routing code:
> >>> >
> >>> > ProducerTemplate<Exchange> serviceProducer =
> >>> > exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();
> >>> >
> >>> > String targetEndpoint = "jbi:service:
> >>> http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService";;
> >>> >
> >>> > *Endpoint* serviceProviderEP =
> >>> > exchange.getContext().getEndpoint(targetEndpoint);
> >>> >
> >>> > Exchange serviceProviderExchange =
> >>> > serviceProviderEP.createExchange(ExchangePattern.*InOut*);
> >>> >
> >>> > *serviceProviderExchange.getIn().setHeader(**"targetOperation",
> >>> > "getForcastPerLocation"**);*
> >>> >
> >>> > serviceProviderExchange.setIn(exchange.getIn());
> >>> >
> >>> > Exchange serviceResultExchange =
> >>> serviceProducer.send(*serviceProviderEP*,
> >>> > serviceProviderExchange);
> >>> >
> >>> > getForcastPerLocation is taken from the wsdl - here in bold:
> >>> >
> >>> >   <wsdl:portType name="ForecastWeatherImp">
> >>> >
> >>> >      <wsdl:operation name="*getForcastPerLocation*">
> >>> >
> >>> >         <wsdl:input message="impl:getForcastPerLocationRequest"
> >>> > name="getForcastPerLocationRequest"/>
> >>> >
> >>> >         <wsdl:output message="impl:getForcastPerLocationResponse"
> >>> > name="getForcastPerLocationResponse"/>
> >>> >
> >>> >      </wsdl:operation>
> >>> >
> >>> >   </wsdl:portType>
> >>> >
> >>> >   <wsdl:binding name="ForecastWeatherImpSoapBinding"
> >>> > type="impl:ForecastWeatherImp">
> >>> >
> >>> >      <wsdlsoap:binding style="document" transport="
> >>> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/<
> >>> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http%22/>
> >>>  >>
> >>> >
> >>> >      <wsdl:operation name="getForcastPerLocation">
> >>> >
> >>> >         <wsdlsoap:operation soapAction=""/>
> >>> >
> >>> >         <wsdl:input name="getForcastPerLocationRequest">
> >>> >
> >>> >            <wsdlsoap:body use="literal"/>
> >>> >
> >>> >         </wsdl:input>
> >>> >
> >>> >         <wsdl:output name="getForcastPerLocationResponse">
> >>> >
> >>> >            <wsdlsoap:body use="literal"/>
> >>> >
> >>> >         </wsdl:output>
> >>> >
> >>> >      </wsdl:operation>
> >>> >
> >>> >   </wsdl:binding>
> >>> >
> >>> > I still get the same error (no SOAPAction header).
> >>> >
> >>> > Do i fit the qualified name of the operation? Do i specify the right
> >>> > operation by the wsdl?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> No, you need to do that when creating and sending the exchange.
> >>> >> Camel should propagate the operation name within the route.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:54, liav ezer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> >> > Do you mean that i need to add targetOperation to my provider's
> >>> xbean?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> The soap action should be set to the corresponding operation
> invoked
> >>> >> >> on the web service.
> >>> >> >> If it is not set, this may be because you did not set the
> operation
> >>> >> >> field on the exchange to the right QName.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:19, liav ezer <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >> > This is the response:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > eXtensible Markup Language
> >>> >> >> >   <?xml
> >>> >> >> >   <soapenv:Envelope
> >>> >> >> >       xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
> "
> >>> >> >> >       xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> >>> >> >> >       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> >>> >> >> >       <soapenv:Body>
> >>> >> >> >            <soapenv:Fault>
> >>> >> >> >                  <faultcode xmlns:ns1="
> >>> http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>
> >>> >> >> >                         *ns1:Client.NoSOAPAction*
> >>> >> >> >                  </faultcode>
> >>> >> >> >                  <faultstring>
> >>> >> >> >                         *no SOAPAction header!*
> >>> >> >> >                  </faultstring>
> >>> >> >> >                  <detail>
> >>> >> >> >                         <ns2:hostname xmlns:ns2="
> >>> >> >> > http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>
> >>> >> >> >                               LIAVE02
> >>> >> >> >                         </ns2:hostname>
> >>> >> >> >                  </detail>
> >>> >> >> >           </soapenv:Fault>
> >>> >> >> >       </soapenv:Body>
> >>> >> >> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Usually i see the request also in this kind of format and the
> >>> sniffer
> >>> >> >> > indicates that this is HTTP/XML protocol but now i see the
> request
> >>> as
> >>> >> i
> >>> >> >> sent
> >>> >> >> > you before with only HTTP Protocol. Clearly something isn't
> right.
> >>> >> >> > The content of the request is ambiguous, this is what i managed
> to
> >>> >> >> extract
> >>> >> >> > from the sniffer:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > [PohsP,POST /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
> >>> HTTP/1.1
> >>> >> >> > Content-Type: text/xml
> >>> >> >> > Host: liave02:8080
> >>> >> >> > Content-Length: 388
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Should i omit the useJbiWrapper=false? I did it in my consumer
> as
> >>> >> well.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> Not sure what you mean.
> >>> >> >> >> The request content type is text/xml so it looks good.
> >>> >> >> >> Do you have the content of the request and the response ?
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:56, liav ezer <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> > Sure, it doesn't say much except for the fact that this
> isn't
> >>> >> http/xml
> >>> >> >> >> but
> >>> >> >> >> > plain http request.
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > Frame 20 (184 bytes on wire, 184 bytes captured)
> >>> >> >> >> > Ethernet II, Src: Msi_5a:17:0a (00:16:17:5a:17:0a), Dst:
> >>> >> >> >> HewlettP_d4:86:e0
> >>> >> >> >> > (00:13:21:d4:86:e0)
> >>> >> >> >> > Internet Protocol, Src: 10.236.11.194 (10.236.11.194), Dst:
> >>> >> >> 10.236.10.91
> >>> >> >> >> > (10.236.10.91)
> >>> >> >> >> > Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: queueadm (2230),
> Dst
> >>> Port:
> >>> >> >> >> http-alt
> >>> >> >> >> > (8080), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 130
> >>> >> >> >> > Hypertext Transfer Protocol
> >>> >> >> >> >     POST /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
> >>> >> HTTP/1.1\r\n
> >>> >> >> >> >           Request Method: POST
> >>> >> >> >> >           Request URI:
> >>> >> /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
> >>> >> >> >> >           Request Version: HTTP/1.1
> >>> >> >> >> >     Content-Type: text/xml\r\n
> >>> >> >> >> >     Content-Length: 388\r\n
> >>> >> >> >> >           Content length: 388
> >>> >> >> >> >     \r\n
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > I also debugged the message object sent to the
> >>> >> doInterceptor(Message)
> >>> >> >> by
> >>> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> > createRequest method (in HttpSoapProviderMarshaler):
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > {interface javax.jbi.messaging.MessageExchange=InOut[
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > id: ID:10.236.11.194-11f364479c2-2:15
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > status: Active
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > role: provider
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > service: {http://prd}ForecastWeatherImpService
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > endpoint: ForecastWeatherImp
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > in: <?xml version="1.0"
> >>> encoding="UTF-8"?><getForcastPerLocation
> >>> >> >> xmlns="
> >>> >> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.oxp.amdocs.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
> >>> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd="
> >>> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
> >>> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
> >>> >> >> >> > "><location>Tel-Aviv</location></getForcastPerLocation>
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> {*interface*javax.jbi.messaging.normalizedmessage=org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.normalizedmessagei...@7a754f
> >>> >> >> >> > {*properties*:
> >>> >> >> {javax.jbi.messaging.protocol.headers={Content-Length=435,
> >>> >> >> >> > User-Agent=Axis/1.4, Host=localhost:8192, SOAPAction="",
> >>> >> >> Pragma=no-cache,
> >>> >> >> >> > Content-Type=text/xml; charset=utf-8, REQUEST_METHOD=POST,
> >>> >> >> >> > Cache-Control=no-cache, CONTENT_TYPE=text/xml;
> charset=utf-8,
> >>> >> >> >> > Accept=application/soap+xml, application/dime,
> >>> multipart/related,
> >>> >> >> text/*,
> >>> >> >> >> > REQUEST_URI=
> >>> >> >> >> http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/
> }<
> >>> >> http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/%7D>
> >>> >> >> }<
> >>> http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/%7D%7D>
> >>> >> >>  >> },
> >>> >> >> >> > class
> java.io.outputstream=java.io.bufferedoutputstr...@1aba945
> >>> }
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > Attachment & SOAP headers are empty.
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > Thanks
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> Unfortunately, our mailing lists strip attachents.  Can you
> >>> >> include
> >>> >> >> it
> >>> >> >> >> >> inline please ?
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:44, liav ezer <
> [email protected]>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> > Sure, attached is a snapshot of the packet sent from the
> >>> >> >> >> soap-provider:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
> >>> >> [email protected]
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Could you give some hints on what the sniffer sees ?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:37, liav ezer <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Right, i saw the fixed getter:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > @Override
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > public String getMethod() {
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >     return HttpMethods.POST;
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > }
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Can you suggest why my provider (as follows) doesn't
> send
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> http
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > request
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > in XML format? (sniffer clearly shows that it's plain
> >>> http &
> >>> >> not
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > http/xml)?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > This is my providers xbean:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="
> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0
> >>> "
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >   <http:soap-provider
> >>> service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >                endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > locationURI="
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> http://drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>  wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >                useJbiWrapper="false"/>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Attached is the wsdl file.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks in advcane.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
> >>> >> >> [email protected]
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, all soap requests are sent using POST method.
>  This
> >>> is
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> expected behavior.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:34, liav ezer <
> >>> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Guillaume,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I debugged the process() method in
> >>> HttpProviderEndpoint
> >>> >> class
> >>> >> >> &
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > looked
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > at
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the value of the http exchange when its being sent:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > getConnectionPool().send(*httpEx*);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The value is:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > httpexcha...@1663347=*post*
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> //drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp#0
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > i also see that the *_requestContent* data member
> is a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > *ByteArrayBuffer*type & has this value:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
> >>> >> >> >> >> "><soap:Body><getForcastPerLocation<
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/%22%3E%3Csoap:Body%3E%3CgetForcastPerLocation
> >>> >> >> >> >> >xmlns="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com";
> xmlns:soapenv="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >>> xmlns:xsd="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> "><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation></soap:Body></soap:Envelope<
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation%3E%3C/soap:Body%3E%3C/soap:Envelope
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It seems that the contecnt is soap but it's sent as
> >>> POST.
> >>> >> Can
> >>> >> >> >> you
> >>> >> >> >> >> see
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > problem?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > From: liav ezer <[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: Http consumer end-point question
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To: [email protected]
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  It seems that the transmission to my service via
> my
> >>> >> >> >> soap-provider
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > isn't
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > soap. I used a sniffer and seen that the request is
> >>> POST
> >>> >> over
> >>> >> >> >> HTTP.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's why i get a fault response specifying that
> >>> there
> >>> >> isn't
> >>> >> >> >> any
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > SOAPAction
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > header...
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I suspected that the camel API
> >>> (producerTemplate.send())
> >>> >> is
> >>> >> >> >> messing
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > my
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > requset so i changed my router do a from().to()
> >>> routing as
> >>> >> >> >> follows:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from*(*
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > *"jbi:service:**http://oxp/oXpInternalService
> >>> >> >> >> ").to("jbi:service:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService";);*
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > & i still get this fault. It seems like it is
> related
> >>> to
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> provider
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > end-point. Do you see something wrong in its
> >>> >> configuration?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
> >>> >> >> >> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The message you see in the NMR won't be the SOAP
> >>> >> envelope.
> >>> >> >>  The
> >>> >> >> >> >> soap
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> envelope is put when the HTTP request is sent and
> >>> removed
> >>> >> >> when
> >>> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> response is received.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You should check what happens on the other side of
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> consumer
> >>> >> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> your ForcastWeatherImp service.  It seems to send
> >>> back a
> >>> >> >> fault
> >>> >> >> >> for
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> some reason.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 09:11, liav ezer <
> >>> >> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ok.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I followed your advise & used the following
> >>> >> soap-provider
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > end-point:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="
> >>> >> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://prd";>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <http:*soap-provider*
> >>> >> >> >> service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               locationURI="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
> "
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               useJbiWrapper="false"/>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but i get an error which i don't understand its
> >>> origin:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  -
> Received
> >>> >> >> exchange:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > status:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Active,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > role: provider
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  -
> Retrieved
> >>> >> >> >> correlation
> >>> >> >> >> >> id:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > null
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using
> >>> default
> >>> >> >> >> request
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider marshaller.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using
> >>> default
> >>> >> >> >> response
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider marshaller.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
> >>> >> >> interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          -
> Invoking
> >>> >> >> >> handleMessage
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl            - Send
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0 in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DeliveryChannel{servicemix-http}
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SecuredBroker                  - send
> >>> exchange
> >>> >> >> with
> >>> >> >> >> >> secure
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > broker
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaFlow                       - Called
> >>> Flow
> >>> >> send
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaQueue                      -
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.sedaqueu...@120a5d7
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dequeued
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exchange: InOut[
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  id: ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  status: Active
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  role: consumer
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  service: {http://prd}ForecastWeatherImpService
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  endpoint: ForecastWeatherImp
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  in: <?xml version="1.0"
> >>> >> >> >> >> encoding="UTF-8"?><getForcastPerLocation
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com";
> >>> xmlns:soapenv="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >>> xmlns:xsd
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> "><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation<
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  *fault: <?xml version="1.0"
> >>> >> >> encoding="UTF-8"?><ns2:hostname
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> xmlns:ns2="**
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://xml.apache.org/axis/
> >>> ">LIAVE02</ns2:hostname*<
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> http://xml.apache.org/axis/%22%3ELIAVE02%3C/ns2:hostname
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  > *>*
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You can see that the in part isn't wrapped with
> >>> either
> >>> >> jbi
> >>> >> >> >> >> wrapper
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > or
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> soap
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > envelope & i guess this is the cause of the
> >>> problem.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Jbi wrapper i don't need, how can i cause the
> >>> request
> >>> >> to
> >>> >> >> be
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wraaped
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <soapenv> tags?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This is the way i invoke the endpoint:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  ProducerTemplate<Exchange> serviceProducer =
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  String targetEndpoint = "jbi:service:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Endpoint serviceProviderEP =
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> exchange.getContext().getEndpoint(targetEndpoint);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Exchange serviceProviderExchange =
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> serviceProviderEP.createExchange(ExchangePattern.InOut);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>  serviceProviderExchange.setIn(exchange.getIn());
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Exchange serviceResultExchange =
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *serviceProducer.send(serviceProviderEP,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serviceProviderExchange);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > *
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  //reply yo the consumer
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >>
>  exchange.getOut().setBody(serviceResultExchange.getOut().getBody());
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet
> <
> >>> >> >> >> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The soap-consumer and soap-provider will
> support
> >>> SOAP
> >>> >> >> while
> >>> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> other
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ones don't (they just pass the request and
> won't
> >>> do
> >>> >> any
> >>> >> >> soap
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> related
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> processing).  If your endpoint is meant to
> provide
> >>> >> access
> >>> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> web
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> services using SOAP, you should use a soap
> >>> endpoint
> >>> >> >> (either
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> consumer
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> or provider).
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> If you use REST, the best way would be to
> create
> >>> your
> >>> >> own
> >>> >> >> >> http
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> marshaler and not use the soap endpoints.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 08:52, liav ezer <
> >>> >> >> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > What is the actual difference between the
> <http
> >>> >> >> consumer>
> >>> >> >> >> &
> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <http
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > soap-consumer>? Does the second one support
> REST
> >>> >> >> services
> >>> >> >> >> as
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > well?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > And, do i need to keep a match between the
> >>> consumer
> >>> >> >> type
> >>> >> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> provider
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > type? It seems like a logical thing to do...
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Guillaume
> Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Have you tried using the soap provider
> endpoint
> >>> ?
> >>> >> It
> >>> >> >> will
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> automatically set the right value for the
> soap
> >>> >> action
> >>> >> >> >> based
> >>> >> >> >> >> on
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wsdl.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <http:soap-provider ... />
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 20:11, Liav Ezer <
> >>> >> >> >> >> [email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for your reply. I use an old http
> >>> provider
> >>> >> &
> >>> >> >> i
> >>> >> >> >> >> guess
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > was
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > origin for those methods. Therefore, i
> >>> replaced
> >>> >> it
> >>> >> >> now
> >>> >> >> >> >> with
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > new
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider as follows:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="
> >>> >> >> >> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <http:provider
> >>> >> >> service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> endpoint="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > locationURI="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
> "
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > />
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > & i get the following error in the SMX
> log:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  fault: <?xml version="1.0"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding="UTF-8"?><soapenv:Envelope
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:soapenv="
> >>> >> >> >> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsd="
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsi="
> >>> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Body>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Fault>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <faultcode
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ">ns1:Client.NoSOAPAction</faultcode>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <faultstring>no SOAPAction
> >>> >> header!</faultstring>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <detail>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >    <ns2:hostname
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns2="http://xml.apache.org/axis/
> >>> >> >> >> >> ">LIAVE02</ns2:hostname>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   </detail>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Fault>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Body>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </soapenv:Envelope>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I also valued the soapAction attribute in
> the
> >>> >> wsdl
> >>> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> be:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > soapAction="no_params" with no change.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Can you suggest on a solution? Can you
> also
> >>> >> advise
> >>> >> >> if i
> >>> >> >> >> >> can
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > use
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> old
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider & a new consumer?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > gnodet wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not sure to understand.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SoapMarshaler and SoapWriter and not used
> >>> with
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> new
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> endpoints,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> they
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are only used with the old
> <http:endpoint/>
> >>> one.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 14:53, Liav Ezer
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I want to use the NEW http consumer
> >>> endpoint
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> (<http:consumer../>)
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> order
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> to attach a marshaller.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> My problem is that i see that the
> exchange
> >>> is
> >>> >> >> >> identified
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> as a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> soap
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> request,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> hence it is wraped in "<env:" envelope &
> >>> body
> >>> >> tags
> >>> >> >> in
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> addition to
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it's
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> actual wrapper which is via soapenv:
> tags.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> This causes an exception.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I debugged it & found out that if i
> convert
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> following
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> boolean
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> false
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> everything is working without this <env>
> >>> >> wrapper.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> public class SoapMarshaler {
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   protected boolean soap = true;
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   public boolean isSoap() {
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       return soap;
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   }
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> }
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> This is called from SoapWriter class:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> if (marshaler.isSoap()) {
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>     writeSoapEnvelope(writer);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> }
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> & indeed writeSoapEnvelope does the
> >>> following
> >>> >> >> >> wrapper:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> public void
> >>> writeSoapEnvelope(XMLStreamWriter
> >>> >> >> writer)
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> throws
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Exception
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> {
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        QName envelope =
> getEnvelopeName();
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapUri =
> >>> >> >> envelope.getNamespaceURI();
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapPrefix =
> >>> >> envelope.getPrefix();
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        writer.setPrefix(soapPrefix,
> >>> soapUri);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>  writer.writeStartElement(soapPrefix,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SoapMarshaler.ENVELOPE,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> soapUri);
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> My question is:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> How do i control the exchange from the
> new
> >>> http
> >>> >> >> >> consumer
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> so
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> it
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> won't
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> recognized as soap or will not be
> wrapped
> >>> as
> >>> >> >> >> described?
> >>> >> >> >> >> I
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> know
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> soap-consumer endpoint wrapps the
> exchange
> >>> with
> >>> >> >> jbi &
> >>> >> >> >> >> you
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> can
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> control
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> via
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> the useJbiWrapper attribute in the
> xbean.
> >>> Is
> >>> >> there
> >>> >> >> a
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> solotion
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> for
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> this
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> also?
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Here is my xbean:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <beans xmlns:http="
> >>> >> >> >> >> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:con="
> >>> >> >> http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com
> >>> >> >> >> "
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:abc="http://abc";>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>  <http:consumer
> >>> >> >> >> >> service="con:PublicForecastWeatherService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> endpoint="PublicForecastWeather"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> locationURI="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> http://localhost:8192/abc/services/internal/forecastWeather?in-out";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>                 defaultMep="
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> targetService="abc:abcInternalService"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>                 marshaler="#marshaler"
> />
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>      <bean id="marshaler"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> class="org.apache.servicemix.jbi.HTTPMarshaler"
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> />
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> </beans>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Liav.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> View this message in context:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21747567.html
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing
> >>> list
> >>> >> >> archive
> >>> >> >> >> at
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nabble.com.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > View this message in context:
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21767145.html
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing
> list
> >>> >> archive
> >>> >> >> at
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nabble.com.
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> --
> >>> >> >> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> --
> >>> >> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>  Cheers,
> >>> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> >> ------------------------
> >>> >> Open Source SOA
> >>> >> http://fusesource.com
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>  Cheers,
> >>> Guillaume Nodet
> >>> ------------------------
> >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>> ------------------------
> >>> Open Source SOA
> >>> http://fusesource.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Reply via email to