The operation is conveyed on camel using the "jbi.operation" header on
the exchange, which value must be the string representation of the
qname for the operation.
Try with:
   exchange.setProperty("jbi.operation", new QName("http://prd";,
"getForcastPerLocation").toString());


On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 13:24, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, i added the below bolded line to my camel routing code:
>
> ProducerTemplate<Exchange> serviceProducer =
> exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();
>
> String targetEndpoint = "jbi:service:http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService";;
>
> *Endpoint* serviceProviderEP =
> exchange.getContext().getEndpoint(targetEndpoint);
>
> Exchange serviceProviderExchange =
> serviceProviderEP.createExchange(ExchangePattern.*InOut*);
>
> *serviceProviderExchange.getIn().setHeader(**"targetOperation",
> "getForcastPerLocation"**);*
>
> serviceProviderExchange.setIn(exchange.getIn());
>
> Exchange serviceResultExchange = serviceProducer.send(*serviceProviderEP*,
> serviceProviderExchange);
>
> getForcastPerLocation is taken from the wsdl - here in bold:
>
>   <wsdl:portType name="ForecastWeatherImp">
>
>      <wsdl:operation name="*getForcastPerLocation*">
>
>         <wsdl:input message="impl:getForcastPerLocationRequest"
> name="getForcastPerLocationRequest"/>
>
>         <wsdl:output message="impl:getForcastPerLocationResponse"
> name="getForcastPerLocationResponse"/>
>
>      </wsdl:operation>
>
>   </wsdl:portType>
>
>   <wsdl:binding name="ForecastWeatherImpSoapBinding"
> type="impl:ForecastWeatherImp">
>
>      <wsdlsoap:binding style="document" transport="
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/<http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http%22/>
>>
>
>      <wsdl:operation name="getForcastPerLocation">
>
>         <wsdlsoap:operation soapAction=""/>
>
>         <wsdl:input name="getForcastPerLocationRequest">
>
>            <wsdlsoap:body use="literal"/>
>
>         </wsdl:input>
>
>         <wsdl:output name="getForcastPerLocationResponse">
>
>            <wsdlsoap:body use="literal"/>
>
>         </wsdl:output>
>
>      </wsdl:operation>
>
>   </wsdl:binding>
>
> I still get the same error (no SOAPAction header).
>
> Do i fit the qualified name of the operation? Do i specify the right
> operation by the wsdl?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No, you need to do that when creating and sending the exchange.
>> Camel should propagate the operation name within the route.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:54, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Do you mean that i need to add targetOperation to my provider's xbean?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The soap action should be set to the corresponding operation invoked
>> >> on the web service.
>> >> If it is not set, this may be because you did not set the operation
>> >> field on the exchange to the right QName.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:19, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > This is the response:
>> >> >
>> >> > eXtensible Markup Language
>> >> >   <?xml
>> >> >   <soapenv:Envelope
>> >> >       xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
>> >> >       xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>> >> >       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>> >> >       <soapenv:Body>
>> >> >            <soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >                  <faultcode xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>
>> >> >                         *ns1:Client.NoSOAPAction*
>> >> >                  </faultcode>
>> >> >                  <faultstring>
>> >> >                         *no SOAPAction header!*
>> >> >                  </faultstring>
>> >> >                  <detail>
>> >> >                         <ns2:hostname xmlns:ns2="
>> >> > http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>
>> >> >                               LIAVE02
>> >> >                         </ns2:hostname>
>> >> >                  </detail>
>> >> >           </soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >       </soapenv:Body>
>> >> > </soapenv:Envelope>
>> >> >
>> >> > Usually i see the request also in this kind of format and the sniffer
>> >> > indicates that this is HTTP/XML protocol but now i see the request as
>> i
>> >> sent
>> >> > you before with only HTTP Protocol. Clearly something isn't right.
>> >> > The content of the request is ambiguous, this is what i managed to
>> >> extract
>> >> > from the sniffer:
>> >> >
>> >> > [PohsP,POST /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp HTTP/1.1
>> >> > Content-Type: text/xml
>> >> > Host: liave02:8080
>> >> > Content-Length: 388
>> >> >
>> >> > Should i omit the useJbiWrapper=false? I did it in my consumer as
>> well.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Not sure what you mean.
>> >> >> The request content type is text/xml so it looks good.
>> >> >> Do you have the content of the request and the response ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:56, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> > Sure, it doesn't say much except for the fact that this isn't
>> http/xml
>> >> >> but
>> >> >> > plain http request.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Frame 20 (184 bytes on wire, 184 bytes captured)
>> >> >> > Ethernet II, Src: Msi_5a:17:0a (00:16:17:5a:17:0a), Dst:
>> >> >> HewlettP_d4:86:e0
>> >> >> > (00:13:21:d4:86:e0)
>> >> >> > Internet Protocol, Src: 10.236.11.194 (10.236.11.194), Dst:
>> >> 10.236.10.91
>> >> >> > (10.236.10.91)
>> >> >> > Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: queueadm (2230), Dst Port:
>> >> >> http-alt
>> >> >> > (8080), Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 130
>> >> >> > Hypertext Transfer Protocol
>> >> >> >     POST /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
>> HTTP/1.1\r\n
>> >> >> >           Request Method: POST
>> >> >> >           Request URI:
>> /ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp
>> >> >> >           Request Version: HTTP/1.1
>> >> >> >     Content-Type: text/xml\r\n
>> >> >> >     Content-Length: 388\r\n
>> >> >> >           Content length: 388
>> >> >> >     \r\n
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I also debugged the message object sent to the
>> doInterceptor(Message)
>> >> by
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > createRequest method (in HttpSoapProviderMarshaler):
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > {interface javax.jbi.messaging.MessageExchange=InOut[
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > id: ID:10.236.11.194-11f364479c2-2:15
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > status: Active
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > role: provider
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > service: {http://prd}ForecastWeatherImpService
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > endpoint: ForecastWeatherImp
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > in: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><getForcastPerLocation
>> >> xmlns="
>> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.oxp.amdocs.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd="
>> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
>> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
>> >> >> > "><location>Tel-Aviv</location></getForcastPerLocation>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> {*interface*javax.jbi.messaging.normalizedmessage=org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.normalizedmessagei...@7a754f
>> >> >> > {*properties*:
>> >> {javax.jbi.messaging.protocol.headers={Content-Length=435,
>> >> >> > User-Agent=Axis/1.4, Host=localhost:8192, SOAPAction="",
>> >> Pragma=no-cache,
>> >> >> > Content-Type=text/xml; charset=utf-8, REQUEST_METHOD=POST,
>> >> >> > Cache-Control=no-cache, CONTENT_TYPE=text/xml; charset=utf-8,
>> >> >> > Accept=application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related,
>> >> text/*,
>> >> >> > REQUEST_URI=
>> >> >> http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/}<
>> http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/%7D>
>> >> }<http://localhost:8192/oxp/services/internal/forecastWeather/%7D%7D>
>> >>  >> },
>> >> >> > class java.io.outputstream=java.io.bufferedoutputstr...@1aba945}
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Attachment & SOAP headers are empty.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Unfortunately, our mailing lists strip attachents.  Can you
>> include
>> >> it
>> >> >> >> inline please ?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:44, liav ezer <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Sure, attached is a snapshot of the packet sent from the
>> >> >> soap-provider:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet <
>> [email protected]
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Could you give some hints on what the sniffer sees ?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:37, liav ezer <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > Right, i saw the fixed getter:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > @Override
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > public String getMethod() {
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >     return HttpMethods.POST;
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Can you suggest why my provider (as follows) doesn't send the
>> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> > request
>> >> >> >> >> > in XML format? (sniffer clearly shows that it's plain http &
>> not
>> >> >> >> >> > http/xml)?
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > This is my providers xbean:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
>> >> >> >> >> >   <http:soap-provider service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >                endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > locationURI="
>> >> >> >>
>> http://drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >> >> >> >> >                wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
>> >> >> >> >> >                useJbiWrapper="false"/>
>> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Attached is the wsdl file.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks in advcane.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> No, all soap requests are sent using POST method.  This is
>> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> expected behavior.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:34, liav ezer <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Guillaume,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I debugged the process() method in HttpProviderEndpoint
>> class
>> >> &
>> >> >> >> >> >> > looked
>> >> >> >> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >> >> >> > the value of the http exchange when its being sent:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > getConnectionPool().send(*httpEx*);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The value is:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > httpexcha...@1663347=*post*
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> //drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp#0
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > i also see that the *_requestContent* data member is a
>> >> >> >> >> >> > *ByteArrayBuffer*type & has this value:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/
>> >> >> >> "><soap:Body><getForcastPerLocation<
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/%22%3E%3Csoap:Body%3E%3CgetForcastPerLocation
>> >> >> >> >xmlns="
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd="
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> "><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation></soap:Body></soap:Envelope<
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation%3E%3C/soap:Body%3E%3C/soap:Envelope
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It seems that the contecnt is soap but it's sent as POST.
>> Can
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> >> see
>> >> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > problem?
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> >> >> >> >> > From: liav ezer <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: Http consumer end-point question
>> >> >> >> >> >> > To: [email protected]
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >  It seems that the transmission to my service via my
>> >> >> soap-provider
>> >> >> >> >> >> > isn't
>> >> >> >> >> >> > soap. I used a sniffer and seen that the request is POST
>> over
>> >> >> HTTP.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > That's why i get a fault response specifying that there
>> isn't
>> >> >> any
>> >> >> >> >> >> > SOAPAction
>> >> >> >> >> >> > header...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I suspected that the camel API (producerTemplate.send())
>> is
>> >> >> messing
>> >> >> >> >> >> > my
>> >> >> >> >> >> > requset so i changed my router do a from().to() routing as
>> >> >> follows:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > from*(*
>> >> >> >> >> >> > *"jbi:service:**http://oxp/oXpInternalService
>> >> >> ").to("jbi:service:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService";);*
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > & i still get this fault. It seems like it is related to
>> the
>> >> >> >> provider
>> >> >> >> >> >> > end-point. Do you see something wrong in its
>> configuration?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >  On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
>> >> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The message you see in the NMR won't be the SOAP
>> envelope.
>> >>  The
>> >> >> >> soap
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> envelope is put when the HTTP request is sent and removed
>> >> when
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> response is received.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> You should check what happens on the other side of the
>> >> consumer
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> your ForcastWeatherImp service.  It seems to send back a
>> >> fault
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> some reason.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 09:11, liav ezer <
>> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ok.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I followed your advise & used the following
>> soap-provider
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > end-point:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="
>> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://prd";>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <http:*soap-provider*
>> >> >> service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               locationURI="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >               useJbiWrapper="false"/>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > but i get an error which i don't understand its origin:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  - Received
>> >> exchange:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > status:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Active,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > role: provider
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  - Retrieved
>> >> >> correlation
>> >> >> >> id:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > null
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using default
>> >> >> request
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider marshaller.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using default
>> >> >> response
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider marshaller.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding
>> >> interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking
>> >> >> handleMessage
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl            - Send
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0 in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DeliveryChannel{servicemix-http}
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SecuredBroker                  - send exchange
>> >> with
>> >> >> >> secure
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > broker
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaFlow                       - Called Flow
>> send
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaQueue                      -
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.sedaqueu...@120a5d7
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dequeued
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exchange: InOut[
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  id: ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  status: Active
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  role: consumer
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  service: {http://prd}ForecastWeatherImpService
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  endpoint: ForecastWeatherImp
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  in: <?xml version="1.0"
>> >> >> >> encoding="UTF-8"?><getForcastPerLocation
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> "><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation<
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  *fault: <?xml version="1.0"
>> >> encoding="UTF-8"?><ns2:hostname
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> xmlns:ns2="**
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>LIAVE02</ns2:hostname*<
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://xml.apache.org/axis/%22%3ELIAVE02%3C/ns2:hostname
>> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>  > *>*
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > You can see that the in part isn't wrapped with either
>> jbi
>> >> >> >> wrapper
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > or
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> soap
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > envelope & i guess this is the cause of the problem.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Jbi wrapper i don't need, how can i cause the request
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wraaped
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <soapenv> tags?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This is the way i invoke the endpoint:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  ProducerTemplate<Exchange> serviceProducer =
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  String targetEndpoint = "jbi:service:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Endpoint serviceProviderEP =
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exchange.getContext().getEndpoint(targetEndpoint);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Exchange serviceProviderExchange =
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> serviceProviderEP.createExchange(ExchangePattern.InOut);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  serviceProviderExchange.setIn(exchange.getIn());
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Exchange serviceResultExchange =
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> *serviceProducer.send(serviceProviderEP,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > serviceProviderExchange);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > *
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  //reply yo the consumer
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>>  exchange.getOut().setBody(serviceResultExchange.getOut().getBody());
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet <
>> >> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The soap-consumer and soap-provider will support SOAP
>> >> while
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> other
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ones don't (they just pass the request and won't do
>> any
>> >> soap
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> related
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> processing).  If your endpoint is meant to provide
>> access
>> >> to
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> web
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> services using SOAP, you should use a soap endpoint
>> >> (either
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> consumer
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> or provider).
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> If you use REST, the best way would be to create your
>> own
>> >> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> marshaler and not use the soap endpoints.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 08:52, liav ezer <
>> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > What is the actual difference between the <http
>> >> consumer>
>> >> >> &
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <http
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > soap-consumer>? Does the second one support REST
>> >> services
>> >> >> as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > well?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > And, do i need to keep a match between the consumer
>> >> type
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> provider
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > type? It seems like a logical thing to do...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Have you tried using the soap provider endpoint ?
>> It
>> >> will
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> automatically set the right value for the soap
>> action
>> >> >> based
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wsdl.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <http:soap-provider ... />
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 20:11, Liav Ezer <
>> >> >> >> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for your reply. I use an old http provider
>> &
>> >> i
>> >> >> >> guess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > was
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > origin for those methods. Therefore, i replaced
>> it
>> >> now
>> >> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > new
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider as follows:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="
>> >> >> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <http:provider
>> >> service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >         endpoint="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > locationURI="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > />
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > & i get the following error in the SMX log:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  fault: <?xml version="1.0"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > encoding="UTF-8"?><soapenv:Envelope
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> >> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsi="
>> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Body>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <faultcode
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ">ns1:Client.NoSOAPAction</faultcode>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <faultstring>no SOAPAction
>> header!</faultstring>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   <detail>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >    <ns2:hostname
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns2="http://xml.apache.org/axis/
>> >> >> >> ">LIAVE02</ns2:hostname>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >   </detail>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Body>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > </soapenv:Envelope>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I also valued the soapAction attribute in the
>> wsdl
>> >> to
>> >> >> be:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > soapAction="no_params" with no change.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Can you suggest on a solution? Can you also
>> advise
>> >> if i
>> >> >> >> can
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > use
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > an
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> old
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > provider & a new consumer?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > gnodet wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not sure to understand.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SoapMarshaler and SoapWriter and not used with
>> the
>> >> new
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> endpoints,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> they
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> are only used with the old <http:endpoint/> one.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 14:53, Liav Ezer
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I want to use the NEW http consumer endpoint
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> (<http:consumer../>)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> order
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> to attach a marshaller.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> My problem is that i see that the exchange is
>> >> >> identified
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> as a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> soap
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> request,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> hence it is wraped in "<env:" envelope & body
>> tags
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> addition to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it's
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> actual wrapper which is via soapenv: tags.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> This causes an exception.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I debugged it & found out that if i convert the
>> >> >> >> following
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> boolean
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> false
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> everything is working without this <env>
>> wrapper.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> public class SoapMarshaler {
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   protected boolean soap = true;
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   public boolean isSoap() {
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       return soap;
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>   }
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> }
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> This is called from SoapWriter class:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> if (marshaler.isSoap()) {
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>     writeSoapEnvelope(writer);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> }
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> & indeed writeSoapEnvelope does the following
>> >> >> wrapper:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> public void writeSoapEnvelope(XMLStreamWriter
>> >> writer)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> throws
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Exception
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> {
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        QName envelope = getEnvelopeName();
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapUri =
>> >> envelope.getNamespaceURI();
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapPrefix =
>> envelope.getPrefix();
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        writer.setPrefix(soapPrefix, soapUri);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>        writer.writeStartElement(soapPrefix,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> SoapMarshaler.ENVELOPE,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> soapUri);
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> My question is:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> How do i control the exchange from the new http
>> >> >> consumer
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> so
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> won't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> recognized as soap or will not be wrapped as
>> >> >> described?
>> >> >> >> I
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> know
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> soap-consumer endpoint wrapps the exchange with
>> >> jbi &
>> >> >> >> you
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> can
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> control
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> via
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> the useJbiWrapper attribute in the xbean. Is
>> there
>> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> solotion
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> this
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> also?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Here is my xbean:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <beans xmlns:http="
>> >> >> >> http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:con="
>> >> http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com
>> >> >> "
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:abc="http://abc";>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>  <http:consumer
>> >> >> >> service="con:PublicForecastWeatherService"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> endpoint="PublicForecastWeather"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> locationURI="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> http://localhost:8192/abc/services/internal/forecastWeather?in-out";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>                 defaultMep="
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> targetService="abc:abcInternalService"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>                 marshaler="#marshaler" />
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>      <bean id="marshaler"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> class="org.apache.servicemix.jbi.HTTPMarshaler"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> />
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks in advance,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Liav.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21747567.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list
>> >> archive
>> >> >> at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21767145.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list
>> archive
>> >> at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>  Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to