Unfortunately, our mailing lists strip attachents.  Can you include it
inline please ?

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:44, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, attached is a snapshot of the packet sent from the soap-provider:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Could you give some hints on what the sniffer sees ?
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:37, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Right, i saw the fixed getter:
>> >
>> > @Override
>> >
>> > public String getMethod() {
>> >
>> >     return HttpMethods.POST;
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > Can you suggest why my provider (as follows) doesn't send the http
>> > request
>> > in XML format? (sniffer clearly shows that it's plain http & not
>> > http/xml)?
>> >
>> > This is my providers xbean:
>> >
>> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> > <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
>> >   <http:soap-provider service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >                endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
>> >
>> >
>> > locationURI="http://drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >                wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
>> >                useJbiWrapper="false"/>
>> > </beans>
>> >
>> > Attached is the wsdl file.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advcane.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No, all soap requests are sent using POST method.  This is the
>> >> expected behavior.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:34, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Guillaume,
>> >> >
>> >> > I debugged the process() method in HttpProviderEndpoint class &
>> >> > looked
>> >> > at
>> >> > the value of the http exchange when its being sent:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > getConnectionPool().send(*httpEx*);
>> >> >
>> >> > The value is:
>> >> >
>> >> > httpexcha...@1663347=*post*
>> >> > //drorav02:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp#0
>> >> >
>> >> > i also see that the *_requestContent* data member is a
>> >> > *ByteArrayBuffer*type & has this value:
>> >> >
>> >> > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";><soap:Body><getForcastPerLocation<http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/%22%3E%3Csoap:Body%3E%3CgetForcastPerLocation>xmlns="
>> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd="
>> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation></soap:Body></soap:Envelope<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation%3E%3C/soap:Body%3E%3C/soap:Envelope>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > It seems that the contecnt is soap but it's sent as POST. Can you see
>> >> > the
>> >> > problem?
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> > From: liav ezer <[email protected]>
>> >> > Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM
>> >> > Subject: Re: Http consumer end-point question
>> >> > To: [email protected]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >  It seems that the transmission to my service via my soap-provider
>> >> > isn't
>> >> > soap. I used a sniffer and seen that the request is POST over HTTP.
>> >> >
>> >> > That's why i get a fault response specifying that there isn't any
>> >> > SOAPAction
>> >> > header...
>> >> >
>> >> > I suspected that the camel API (producerTemplate.send()) is messing
>> >> > my
>> >> > requset so i changed my router do a from().to() routing as follows:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > from*(*
>> >> > *"jbi:service:**http://oxp/oXpInternalService";).to("jbi:service:
>> >> > http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService";);*
>> >> >
>> >> > & i still get this fault. It seems like it is related to the provider
>> >> > end-point. Do you see something wrong in its configuration?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >  On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The message you see in the NMR won't be the SOAP envelope.  The soap
>> >> >> envelope is put when the HTTP request is sent and removed when the
>> >> >> response is received.
>> >> >> You should check what happens on the other side of the consumer in
>> >> >> your ForcastWeatherImp service.  It seems to send back a fault for
>> >> >> some reason.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 09:11, liav ezer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> > Ok.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I followed your advise & used the following soap-provider
>> >> >> > end-point:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> > xmlns:prd="
>> >> >> > http://prd";>
>> >> >> >  <http:*soap-provider* service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >               endpoint="ForecastWeatherImp"
>> >> >> >               locationURI="
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >> >> >               wsdl="classpath:ForecastWeatherImp.wsdl"
>> >> >> >               useJbiWrapper="false"/>
>> >> >> > </beans>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > but i get an error which i don't understand its origin:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  - Received exchange:
>> >> >> > status:
>> >> >> Active,
>> >> >> > role: provider
>> >> >> > DEBUG - HttpComponent                  - Retrieved correlation id:
>> >> >> > null
>> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using default request
>> >> >> > encoding
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> > provider marshaller.
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiOutWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.BodyOutInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - DefaultHttpProviderMarshaler   - Using default response
>> >> >> > encoding
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> > provider marshaller.
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Adding interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.mime.AttachmentsInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.xml.StaxInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> org.apache.servicemix.soap.bindings.soap.interceptors.SoapFaultInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInWsdl1Interceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - PhaseInterceptorChain          - Invoking handleMessage on
>> >> >> > interceptor
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.soap.interceptors.jbi.JbiInInterceptor
>> >> >> > DEBUG - DeliveryChannelImpl            - Send
>> >> >> > ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0 in
>> >> >> > DeliveryChannel{servicemix-http}
>> >> >> > DEBUG - SecuredBroker                  - send exchange with secure
>> >> >> > broker
>> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaFlow                       - Called Flow send
>> >> >> > DEBUG - SedaQueue                      -
>> >> >> > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.sedaqueu...@120a5d7
>> >> >> > dequeued
>> >> >> > exchange: InOut[
>> >> >> >  id: ID:10.236.11.194-11f35e61a07-2:0
>> >> >> >  status: Active
>> >> >> >  role: consumer
>> >> >> >  service: {http://prd}ForecastWeatherImpService
>> >> >> >  endpoint: ForecastWeatherImp
>> >> >> >  in: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><getForcastPerLocation
>> >> >> > xmlns="
>> >> >> > http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com"; xmlns:soapenv="
>> >> >> > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd
>> >> >> > ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
>> >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
>> >> >> "><location>Ashdod</location></getForcastPerLocation<
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance%22%3E%3Clocation%3EAshdod%3C/location%3E%3C/getForcastPerLocation
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >  *fault: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ns2:hostname
>> >> >> xmlns:ns2="**
>> >> >> > http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>LIAVE02</ns2:hostname*<
>> >> >> http://xml.apache.org/axis/%22%3ELIAVE02%3C/ns2:hostname>
>> >> >>  > *>*
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You can see that the in part isn't wrapped with either jbi wrapper
>> >> >> > or
>> >> >> soap
>> >> >> > envelope & i guess this is the cause of the problem.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Jbi wrapper i don't need, how can i cause the request to be
>> >> >> > wraaped
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > <soapenv> tags?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This is the way i invoke the endpoint:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  ProducerTemplate<Exchange> serviceProducer =
>> >> >> > exchange.getContext().createProducerTemplate();
>> >> >> >  String targetEndpoint = "jbi:service:
>> >> >> http://prd/ForecastWeatherImpService
>> >> >> > ";
>> >> >> >  Endpoint serviceProviderEP =
>> >> >> > exchange.getContext().getEndpoint(targetEndpoint);
>> >> >> >  Exchange serviceProviderExchange =
>> >> >> > serviceProviderEP.createExchange(ExchangePattern.InOut);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  serviceProviderExchange.setIn(exchange.getIn());
>> >> >> >  Exchange serviceResultExchange =
>> >> >> *serviceProducer.send(serviceProviderEP,
>> >> >> > serviceProviderExchange);
>> >> >> > *
>> >> >> >  //reply yo the consumer
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  exchange.getOut().setBody(serviceResultExchange.getOut().getBody());
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> The soap-consumer and soap-provider will support SOAP while the
>> >> >> >> other
>> >> >> >> ones don't (they just pass the request and won't do any soap
>> >> >> >> related
>> >> >> >> processing).  If your endpoint is meant to provide access to a
>> >> >> >> web
>> >> >> >> services using SOAP, you should use a soap endpoint (either
>> >> >> >> consumer
>> >> >> >> or provider).
>> >> >> >> If you use REST, the best way would be to create your own http
>> >> >> >> marshaler and not use the soap endpoints.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 08:52, liav ezer <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > What is the actual difference between the <http consumer> & the
>> >> >> >> > <http
>> >> >> >> > soap-consumer>? Does the second one support REST services as
>> >> >> >> > well?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > And, do i need to keep a match between the consumer type to the
>> >> >> provider
>> >> >> >> > type? It seems like a logical thing to do...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> > <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Have you tried using the soap provider endpoint ? It will
>> >> >> >> >> automatically set the right value for the soap action based on
>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> wsdl.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> <http:soap-provider ... />
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 20:11, Liav Ezer <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for your reply. I use an old http provider & i guess
>> >> >> >> >> > it
>> >> >> >> >> > was
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> > origin for those methods. Therefore, i replaced it now with
>> >> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >> > new
>> >> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> > provider as follows:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:prd="http://prd";>
>> >> >> >> >> >  <http:provider service="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >         endpoint="prd:ForecastWeatherImpService"
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > locationURI="
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> http://localhost:8080/ForecasterService/services/ForecastWeatherImp";
>> >> >> >> >> > />
>> >> >> >> >> > </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > & i get the following error in the SMX log:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >  fault: <?xml version="1.0"
>> >> >> >> >> > encoding="UTF-8"?><soapenv:Envelope
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Body>
>> >> >> >> >> >  <soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >> >> >> >   <faultcode
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/
>> >> >> >> >> ">ns1:Client.NoSOAPAction</faultcode>
>> >> >> >> >> >   <faultstring>no SOAPAction header!</faultstring>
>> >> >> >> >> >   <detail>
>> >> >> >> >> >    <ns2:hostname
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > xmlns:ns2="http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>LIAVE02</ns2:hostname>
>> >> >> >> >> >   </detail>
>> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Fault>
>> >> >> >> >> >  </soapenv:Body>
>> >> >> >> >> > </soapenv:Envelope>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > I also valued the soapAction attribute in the wsdl to be:
>> >> >> >> >> > soapAction="no_params" with no change.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Can you suggest on a solution? Can you also advise if i can
>> >> >> >> >> > use
>> >> >> >> >> > an
>> >> >> old
>> >> >> >> >> > provider & a new consumer?
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > gnodet wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Not sure to understand.
>> >> >> >> >> >> SoapMarshaler and SoapWriter and not used with the new
>> >> >> >> >> >> endpoints,
>> >> >> >> they
>> >> >> >> >> >> are only used with the old <http:endpoint/> one.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 14:53, Liav Ezer
>> >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> I want to use the NEW http consumer endpoint
>> >> >> >> >> >>> (<http:consumer../>)
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> >>> order
>> >> >> >> >> >>> to attach a marshaller.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> My problem is that i see that the exchange is identified
>> >> >> >> >> >>> as a
>> >> >> soap
>> >> >> >> >> >>> request,
>> >> >> >> >> >>> hence it is wraped in "<env:" envelope & body tags in
>> >> >> >> >> >>> addition to
>> >> >> >> it's
>> >> >> >> >> >>> actual wrapper which is via soapenv: tags.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> This causes an exception.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> I debugged it & found out that if i convert the following
>> >> >> >> >> >>> boolean
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> >>> false
>> >> >> >> >> >>> everything is working without this <env> wrapper.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> public class SoapMarshaler {
>> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
>> >> >> >> >> >>>   protected boolean soap = true;
>> >> >> >> >> >>>   ...
>> >> >> >> >> >>>   public boolean isSoap() {
>> >> >> >> >> >>>       return soap;
>> >> >> >> >> >>>   }
>> >> >> >> >> >>> }
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> This is called from SoapWriter class:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> if (marshaler.isSoap()) {
>> >> >> >> >> >>>     writeSoapEnvelope(writer);
>> >> >> >> >> >>> }
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> & indeed writeSoapEnvelope does the following wrapper:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> public void writeSoapEnvelope(XMLStreamWriter writer)
>> >> >> >> >> >>> throws
>> >> >> >> Exception
>> >> >> >> >> {
>> >> >> >> >> >>>        QName envelope = getEnvelopeName();
>> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapUri = envelope.getNamespaceURI();
>> >> >> >> >> >>>        String soapPrefix = envelope.getPrefix();
>> >> >> >> >> >>>        writer.setPrefix(soapPrefix, soapUri);
>> >> >> >> >> >>>        writer.writeStartElement(soapPrefix,
>> >> >> SoapMarshaler.ENVELOPE,
>> >> >> >> >> >>> soapUri);
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> My question is:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> How do i control the exchange from the new http consumer
>> >> >> >> >> >>> so
>> >> >> >> >> >>> it
>> >> >> won't
>> >> >> >> be
>> >> >> >> >> >>> recognized as soap or will not be wrapped as described? I
>> >> >> >> >> >>> know
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> http
>> >> >> >> >> >>> soap-consumer endpoint wrapps the exchange with jbi & you
>> >> >> >> >> >>> can
>> >> >> >> control
>> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> >>> via
>> >> >> >> >> >>> the useJbiWrapper attribute in the xbean. Is there a
>> >> >> >> >> >>> solotion
>> >> >> >> >> >>> for
>> >> >> >> this
>> >> >> >> >> >>> also?
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Here is my xbean:
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:con="http://service.app.esb.abc.liav.com";
>> >> >> >> >> >>>       xmlns:abc="http://abc";>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>  <http:consumer service="con:PublicForecastWeatherService"
>> >> >> >> >> >>>                 endpoint="PublicForecastWeather"
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> locationURI="
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> http://localhost:8192/abc/services/internal/forecastWeather?in-out";
>> >> >> >> >> >>>                 defaultMep="
>> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> >> >> >>>                 targetService="abc:abcInternalService"
>> >> >> >> >> >>>                 marshaler="#marshaler" />
>> >> >> >> >> >>>      <bean id="marshaler"
>> >> >> >> >> class="org.apache.servicemix.jbi.HTTPMarshaler"
>> >> >> >> >> >>> />
>> >> >> >> >> >>> </beans>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks in advance,
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Liav.
>> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >> >> >>> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21747567.html
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at
>> >> >> Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> > View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Http-consumer-end-point-question-tp21747567p21767145.html
>> >> >> >> >> > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at
>> >> >> >> >> > Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>  Cheers,
>> >> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >> ------------------------
>> >> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to