Hey guys,

I'd like to add my support for SMX sticking around as its own thing - we've
recently started using SMX where I work, and it saved me an awful lot of
time, along with leading me to things like Apache Karaf - which I had not
heard of before I started using SMX.

Personally, the most valuable thing that SMX provided me was a collection
of features that are known to play well together, which meant that I could
spend most of my time learning how to *use* those features, rather than
trying to assemble them all together and *then* learning how to use them -
which could be a pretty significant amount of time.

The one other thing I would like to add is that I do use the NMR, simply as
a really easy way to connect two Camel routes in separate bundles without
the hassle of trying to configure JMS routes (this also means that I can
undeploy bundle X, while leaving bundles Y and Z in-place, which is
important for me). I'm sure I could find something to replace it, but
that's the easiest solution for me right now.

I don't know if I could do much to help, except to say that, yes, SMX was
absolutely useful to me, and I would like to see it stick around.

Thanks,

- Andrew


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Christian Müller <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gert, hi all!
>
> I think there is really a need for an open source ESB. In my opinion, it
> should be Apache ServiceMix X.
>
> If it helps, drop the (legacy) support for ServiceMix 4.x and restart with
> ServiceMix 5 which should be more easily to maintain.
>
> Ping me, if you have something specific I can work on. You can count on me!
>
> Best,
> Christian
> -----------------
>
> Software Integration Specialist
>
> Apache Member
> V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
> Apache Incubator PMC Member
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Gert Vanthienen
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > L.S.,
> >
> >
> > First of all, thank you for starting this discussion!  I definitely
> > agree with everything that has already been said on this thread. We
> > have been ignoring the important, key question for far too long on our
> > mailing lists: Is there a community of users that are interested in
> > having an Apache project that is solely about combining ActiveMQ,
> > Camel, CXF, Karaf and a few other things into a single integration
> > platform distribution?  That is the real question we have to answer
> > here.
> >
> > I started updating ServiceMix 4.x to the latest version a while ago,
> > but given the large legacy codebase and the number of subprojects that
> > we have, that is quite an undertaking.  Apart from the JBI itests
> > issue, we would also have to get the Features project upgrade done and
> > then do all the release.  This is why we restarted the ServiceMix 5
> > effort a year ago: to have a single project with just the dependency
> > versions to update and then cut a release would be a really great
> > thing, compared to the amount of work we now have to do.
> >
> > It looks like nobody out here is interested in doing all that work on
> > the 4.x line and from what I read, the jury is still out on what
> > should happen with the ServiceMix 5 effort.  There probably is some
> > value in this type of distribution to get people started with the
> > entire stack of projects more easily, without having to resort to
> > vendor-specific solutions like JBoss Fuse, Fabric8, Talend ESB, ...
> > from day one.
> >
> > We really need some people to do the work though.  If nobody is
> > able/willing to put in the effort, it might be better to look into
> > finishing up the project with a bit of style instead of letting it
> > slowly die in the background.  With a nice announcement, pointing to
> > the appropriate documentation on the Camel, CXF, Karaf, ... websites,
> > we can definitely get the few people that end up on the ServiceMix
> > project website oriented pretty quickly towards a DIY solution
> > starting with a plain Karaf installation.
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine with either solution.  I have always personally
> > liked the Apache ServiceMix project, so if there's some interest to
> > keep doing this, I'll gladly help out there.  But on the other hand:
> > it's pretty hard to build a community around only a single assembly
> > project, so if there's no real interest, I'll gladly work with
> > everyone else to draft up a nice announcement and point people towards
> > a better solution as well.
> >
> > Not sure what the best way is to decide this.  Perhaps start a vote on
> > what to do next?  Given the meaning assigned to the different vote
> > options on https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html, that might
> > give us a good idea about who is actually willing/able to help out,
> > but I'm open to any suggestions here.
> >
> >
> > Regards and thanks again for getting this discussion in the open,
> >
> > Gert Vanthienen
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Gert Vanthienen
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Cristiano Costantini
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > as I'm waiting for Servicemix 4.6.0 to come out because it solves some
> > > problems with the version of some bundles, I was wondering if I should
> > move
> > > to Karaf (2.3.3) instead on using Servicemix as the basis for my
> > > application.
> > >
> > > In fact I use Spring, Pax Web, Camel and CXF, and I'll probably need
> > > ActiveMQ if I need to implement some specific EIP. I need many
> > dependencies
> > > from the servicemix bundles of wrapped dependencies, but I don't other
> > > ServiceMix features, especially NMR that I understand from SMX4NMR-319
> is
> > > blocking release of 4.6.0.
> > >
> > > What you suggest me to do?
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > Cristiano
> >
>

Reply via email to