Hi, sounds reasonable to me, we might be able to push those enterprise features of Karaf to ServiceMix. So have "Released" Feature descriptors available from ServiceMix and a pre-assembled ServiceMix Container with dedicated features. This way it's easier to have those openEJB features and other stuff that runs on top of Karaf at one place. For example the right now kind of "neglected" WebConsole of Karaf could be moved here. This way we'd have a one Console fit's them all, but again on feature basis, so everyone is either free to install and use it or use something different :)
regards, Achim 2014-02-11 11:55 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]>: > Hi > > In my opinion we should have a custom Karaf distribution in Apache which > assemblies Camel, CXF, ActiveMQ, some BPM (e.g. Activiti). It can still be > ServiceMix. We should only think about making ServiceMix better upgradeable > to the new Karaf kernel. I think also, we should start ServiceMix with > Karaf 3.x. > > Best regards > Krzysztof > > > > On 11.02.2014 08:46, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> It's good to see so much support for ServiceMix again. >> Looks like a valuable Community is forming up again. >> GREAT :) >> >> The reason I told Cristiano to stick to a "self" made >> "servicmix-like-container" >> is just the turn around timings we do have right now. >> And this is just due to the fact that most of the work is done by just to >> few people. >> Correct me if I'm wrong but right now we have about two people for >> Servicmix and >> one for Karaf doing 80+ % of the work, at least this is my impression. >> >> So anyone interested in keeping Servicemix alive (including me ;) ) should >> go ahead and >> try to fix stuff that seems wrong (in documentation or src) help keeping >> those turn around timings on releasing low :D >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> 2014-02-11 8:41 GMT+01:00 Bart Horré <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm also "interested in having an Apache >>> project that is solely about combining ActiveMQ, Camel, CXF, Karaf and a >>> few other things into a single integration platform distribution" >>> >>> Like in Andrew's case, ServiceMix was my start in the road to getting to >>> know Camel, ActiveMQ, CXF, Karaf, ... >>> I didn't really realize at the time a started out, but I am glad there is >>> an out of the box solution which supports all these technologies without >>> a >>> hassle. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bart Horré >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Cristiano Costantini < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Il lunedì 10 febbraio 2014, Andrew Thorburn <[email protected]> ha >>>> >>> scritto: >>> >>>> The one other thing I would like to add is that I do use the NMR, >>>>> >>>> simply >>> >>>> as >>>> >>>>> a really easy way to connect two Camel routes in separate bundles >>>>> >>>> without >>> >>>> the hassle of trying to configure JMS routes >>>>> >>>>> Hi Andrew, >>>> I used NMR too but now I use the Camel VM component for the same >>>> purpose. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> >> >> > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center < > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > Twitter: @KSobkowiak > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
