Daniel, I agree 100% with what you've said.
Kind regards On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 3:53 PM Daniel Neculai <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, at the risk of making myself unpopular too, as someone said before… > It’s quite interesting to view people that doesn’t use EAS (or virtually > anything else IRL) actually pushing the idea of it being removed for things > like “i don’t use it” or “I hate it” or “it’s created by Microsoft"… > > With all the respect for you all, if it is there but you hate it or don’t > want to use it, you have the OPTION, the CHOICE, to disable or not to > activate it on your deployment. But for all the rest of us that rely on it > in any way, not having it there could be quite a problem. I will never > understand why people act so selfish and individual, especially there where > is a place for all… if you don’t need it, just don’t use it, but don’t push > for its removal just because you don’t want to use it, knowing some other > people actually need it and use it and will be impacted by its removal... > > From my point of view, and because I actually use it, it’s a bad thing the > devs want to drop EAS. I really hope they will make us all a favor and keep > it, or at least support it as an addon that can be installed over any v6 > deployment. > > > Best regards, > Daniel
