> > Hey guys, > > > > I was looking at the Bayes scores in 3.0 and had a couple of questions: > [...] > > <zombie voice> > ... the FAQ ... read the FAQ ... > </zombie voice>
Great Bob, the FAQ says how the scores are generated, I surmised that. But these questions aren't in the FAQ: Does a human review the scores generated by the statistics engine? Doesn't it make sense to have more of a bell curve on the 2nd set of bayes scores? If not, why not? The teeth seem seem to be taken out of BAYES_99 with it's low 1.9 score, and most of my spam is triggering .99 to 1. That to me seems like an obvious oversight, and I'm just wondering what the thinking was to leave it at 1.9 for the 3.0 release.
