users  

Messages by Thread

• What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? A.Schulze via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Matija Nalis
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Bill Cole
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? A.Schulze via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Noel Butler
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? bOnK
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: What breaks the validity of DKIM signature? Thomas Barth via users
• Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules. Thomas Krichel
  • Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules. Martin F via users
  • Re: Weird characters (again) getting around filter rules. Mark London
• welcomelist_from_spf otto.cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf John Hardin
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Otto Cooper
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf John Hardin
  • Re: welcomelist_from_spf Antony Stone
• (No Subject) Rupert Gallagher
• QR code phish in Word docs? Alex
  • Re: QR code phish in Word docs? Ricky Boone
• False positive from DONATION_BODY Rupert Gallagher
  • Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY Bill Cole
  • Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY Rupert Gallagher
  • Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY jdow
  • Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY Rupert Gallagher
  • Re: False positive from DONATION_BODY Bill Cole
• Wrong DMARC results for subdomains? Wolfgang Breyha
  • Re: Wrong DMARC results for subdomains? Matija Nalis
  • Re: Wrong DMARC results for subdomains? Wolfgang Breyha
• Latest time a masscheck must be submitted? Tobi
  • Re: Latest time a masscheck must be submitted? giovanni
  • Re: Latest time a masscheck must be submitted? Giovanni Bechis
• url blacklist natan
  • Re: url blacklist Jimmy
  • Re: url blacklist natan
  • Re: url blacklist Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: url blacklist Bill Cole
• dkim failed, but bonus? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Bill Cole
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Matija Nalis
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: dkim failed, but bonus? Matija Nalis
• unknown rDNS Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: unknown rDNS Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: unknown rDNS Thomas Barth via users
  • Re[2]: unknown rDNS Tobi
• Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Benoît Panizzon
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? lucas
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Jimmy
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Benoît Panizzon
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Bill Cole
  • Re[2]: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Tobi
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Benoît Panizzon
  • Re: Score based on MX of evelope / from domain? Tobi
• URLs in ExtractText? Jared Hall via users
  • Re: URLs in ExtractText? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: URLs in ExtractText? Jared Hall via users
  • Re: URLs in ExtractText? giovanni
  • Re: URLs in ExtractText? Jared Hall via users
• MySQL Bayes store, and bayes_auto_expire, not auto-expiring Jess Robinson
  • Re: MySQL Bayes store, and bayes_auto_expire, not auto-expiring giovanni
• AR headers Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: AR headers Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: AR headers Benny Pedersen via users
• dccifd broken pipe? Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
  • Re: dccifd broken pipe? Matija Nalis
  • Re: [sa-list] dccifd errors (connection closed/broken pipe caused by shortcircuits) Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
  • Re: [sa-list] dccifd errors (connection closed/broken pipe caused by shortcircuits) Matija Nalis
• Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Jared Hall via users
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Matija Nalis
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Bill Cole
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Do I have to disable dns blockzones? Andy Smith
• public.pyzor.org down? Brent Clark
  • Re: public.pyzor.org down? Nix
  • Re: public.pyzor.org down? Francesc Peñalvez i Solei via users
  • Re: public.pyzor.org down? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working" Ricky Boone
  • Re: Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working" Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working" Ricky Boone
  • Re: Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working" Ricky Boone
  • Re: Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working" Bill Cole
• oracledelivery phish leading to M365 login Alex
  • Re: oracledelivery phish leading to M365 login John Hardin
• Re: confirm unsubscribe from [email protected] Yassine Chaouche
• Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Xavier Humbert
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Matija Nalis
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Xavier Humbert
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis giovanni
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Xavier Humbert
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Bill Cole
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Xavier Humbert
  • Re: Upgrade spamassassin from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 breaks amavis Jared Hall via users
• New type of spam Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: New type of spam hg user
  • Re: New type of spam hg user
  • Re: New type of spam Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: New type of spam giovanni
  • Re: New type of spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: New type of spam Thomas Barth via users
  • Re: New type of spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• Access change on ruleqa.spamassassin.org Bill Cole
• From: header rule doesn't trigger, except if I run it manually from the command line. Mark London
  • Re: From: header rule doesn't trigger, except if I run it manually from the command line. Bill Cole
• SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Giovanni Bechis
  • Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Bill Cole
  • Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! giovanni
  • RE: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Marc
  • Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Bill Cole
  • Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! giovanni
  • [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Giovanni Bechis
  • Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Bill Cole
  • Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Antony Stone
  • RE: [VOTE] SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Kenneth Porter
  • Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Giovanni Bechis
  • Re: [VOTE] Re: SpamAssassin Logo Contest !! Giovanni Bechis
• Performance degradation in 4.0.2? Tobi
  • Re: Performance degradation in 4.0.2? giovanni
  • Re: Performance degradation in 4.0.2? Tobi
  • Re: Performance degradation in 4.0.2? Tobi
  • Re: Performance degradation in 4.0.2? Tobi
• Hidden text. Mark London
  • Re: Hidden text. giovanni
  • Re: Hidden text. Alan via users
  • Re: Hidden text. Hans Mayer
  • Re: Hidden text. Alan via users
  • Re: Hidden text. Bill Cole
  • Re: Hidden text. Pedro David Marco via users
• Score for KAM_LIST3_1 Alan via users
  • Re: Score for KAM_LIST3_1 Greg Troxel
  • Re: Score for KAM_LIST3_1 Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: Score for KAM_LIST3_1 giovanni
• DMARC avoidance Vladislav Nikolaev
• Phrase of the day ""inbox placement rate". Mark London
• HEADS-UP: TxRep breaking change Giovanni Bechis
• ExtractText and zbarimg Alex
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg giovanni
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg Giovanni Bechis
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg Alex
  • Re: ExtractText and zbarimg giovanni
• _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8,_SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8,,SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 etc. Mark London
  • Re: _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8,_SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8,,SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 etc. Bill Cole
• _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 Lichtinger, Bernhard
  • Re: _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 Bill Cole
  • Re: _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 Lichtinger, Bernhard
  • Re: _SCC_HTML_ODDDIV8 Benny Pedersen via users
• more forwards Benny Pedersen via users
• Match sending IP rdns name? Benoît Panizzon
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Mark London
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Bill Cole
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Benoit Panizzon
  • Shall localhost be added to trusted_networks? (Re: Match sending IP rdns name?) Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Shall localhost be added to trusted_networks? (Re: Match sending IP rdns name?) Bill Cole
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Philip Prindeville via users
  • Re: Match sending IP rdns name? Benoit Panizzon
• .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Bill Cole
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored jdow
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Newlon, Phil
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Newlon, Phil
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Bill Cole
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: .../updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf is ignored Vincent Lefevre

• Earlier messages