users  

Messages by Thread

• SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts FalconChristopher
  • Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts Dave Funk
  • Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts FalconChristopher
  • Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SpamAssassin two level verification between remote hosts Bill Cole
• Fake emails from [email protected]. Mark London
  • Re: Fake emails from [email protected]. Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
  • Re: Fake emails from [email protected]. David B Funk
  • Re: Fake emails from [email protected]. Charles Sprickman
• HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Greg Troxel
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Matija Nalis
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Greg Troxel
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Matija Nalis
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Andrew C Aitchison
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Bill Cole
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Greg Troxel
  • Re: HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE firing on html that looks ok Andrew C Aitchison
• Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Martin F via users
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoît Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? giovanni
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Andrew C Aitchison
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Matija Nalis
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? giovanni
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Rule for: Subject contains email address from To: header? Benoit Panizzon
• DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? J Doe
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? Greg Troxel
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? J Doe
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? Tom Bartel
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? J Doe
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? Tom Bartel
  • RE: Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? Arnaud de Prelle via users
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? J Doe
  • Re: DNS issues: support-intelligence.net ? Arnaud de Prelle via users
• Help with rule against fake invoices (match name= attribute of Content-Type HDR) Benoit Panizzon
  • Re: Help with rule against fake invoices (match name= attribute of Content-Type HDR) Loren Wilton
• SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? FalconChristopher
  • RE: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Scott Techlist
  • RE: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Marc
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? FalconChristopher
  • RE: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Marc
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Bill Cole
  • RE: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Marc
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? FalconChristopher
  • Re[2]: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Michael Grant via users
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Bill Cole
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? FalconChristopher
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Bill Cole
  • Re[2]: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Michael Grant via users
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Bill Cole
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SpamAssissan doesn't run after installation ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• Paid RBLs in default? Charles Sprickman
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? Bill Cole
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? Bill Cole
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? John Levine
  • Re: Paid RBLs in default? Kris Deugau
• share.google is redirector Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: share.google is redirector giovanni
• Setup instructions for Spamassassin on Ubuntu Server 24.04.4 LTS using Sendmail Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: Setup instructions for Spamassassin on Ubuntu Server 24.04.4 LTS using Sendmail Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: Setup instructions for Spamassassin on Ubuntu Server 24.04.4 LTS using Sendmail Bill Cole
  • Re: Setup instructions for Spamassassin on Ubuntu Server 24.04.4 LTS using Sendmail Ted Mittelstaedt
• Problem with new spamassassin install Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: Problem with new spamassassin install giovanni
  • Re: Problem with new spamassassin install Ted Mittelstaedt
• rsync.spamassassin.org respond slowly A. Schulze via users
  • Re: rsync.spamassassin.org respond slowly Benny Pedersen via users
• Redirectors Plugin vs. google maps => consent.google.com Wolfgang Breyha via users
  • Re: Redirectors Plugin vs. google maps => consent.google.com giovanni
  • Re: Redirectors Plugin vs. google maps => consent.google.com giovanni
• /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a /var/log/sa-update.log failing Mark London
  • Re: /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a /var/log/sa-update.log failing John Hardin
• outbound.protection.outlook.com, __RDNS_NONE and IPv6 ? Andrew C Aitchison
  • Re: outbound.protection.outlook.com, __RDNS_NONE and IPv6 ? Greg Troxel
  • Re: outbound.protection.outlook.com, __RDNS_NONE and IPv6 ? Bill Cole
• harmless emails trigger rule EMPTY_MESSAGE, why and how to avoid? Gregor Zattler
  • Re: harmless emails trigger rule EMPTY_MESSAGE, why and how to avoid? Bill Cole
  • Re: harmless emails trigger rule EMPTY_MESSAGE, why and how to avoid? Gregor Zattler
  • Re: harmless emails trigger rule EMPTY_MESSAGE, why and how to avoid? Bill Cole
• SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Greg Troxel
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Greg Troxel
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: SEO spam with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Bill Cole
• Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Mark London
  • RE: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Marc
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? 황병희
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Charles Sprickman
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Bill Cole
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: Is every email that comes from googleusercontent.com, spam? Bill Cole
• Trying to listen to spamd with both ssl and non-ssl fails under FreeBSD. Dan Mahoney
  • Re: Trying to listen to spamd with both ssl and non-ssl fails under FreeBSD. Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
• UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x Jona Müller
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x Jona Müller
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x Jona Müller
  • Re: UTF-8 support / Perl regex \p{} unicode character property in 4.0.x John Hardin
• Help with KAM rule set setup Scott Techlist
  • Re: Help with KAM rule set setup Jared Hall via users
  • Re: Help with KAM rule set setup giovanni
  • Help with KAM rule set setup (RHEL10, SA 4.0) Scott Techlist
  • Re: Help with KAM rule set setup (RHEL10, SA 4.0) Bill Cole
  • RE: Help with KAM rule set setup (RHEL10, SA 4.0) Scott Techlist
  • Re: Help with KAM rule set setup Greg Troxel
  • Re: Help with KAM rule set setup Jared Hall via users
  • RE: Help with KAM rule set setup Scott Techlist
  • RE: Help with KAM rule set setup John Hardin
  • RE: Help with KAM rule set setup John Hardin
• T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Marc
  • Re: T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Matija Nalis
• TXREP gone wild? Alex
  • Re: TXREP gone wild? giovanni
  • Re: TXREP gone wild? Alex
  • Re: TXREP gone wild? giovanni
  • Re: TXREP gone wild? Benjamin Block
• Debugging white/black-listing Philip Prindeville via users
  • Re: Debugging white/black-listing Greg Troxel
  • Re: Debugging white/black-listing Bill Cole
  • Re: Debugging white/black-listing jdow
  • Re: Debugging white/black-listing David B Funk
  • Re: Debugging white/black-listing Jared Hall via users
• recently updated to 4.0.2 Marc
  • Re: recently updated to 4.0.2 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • RE: recently updated to 4.0.2 Marc
  • Re: recently updated to 4.0.2 Bill Cole
  • RE: recently updated to 4.0.2 Marc
  • What IP is used for the validity plugin? Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Bill Cole
  • Sv: Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: Sv: Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Axb
  • Re: Sv: Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Bill Cole
  • Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? John Hardin
  • Sv: Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: Sv: Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin? Anders Gustafsson
• rule assistence A.Schulze via users
  • Re: rule assistence Axb
  • Re: rule assistence A.Schulze via users
  • Re: rule assistence Matija Nalis
  • Re: rule assistence Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: rule assistence Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: rule assistence Noel Butler
  • Re: rule assistence Benny Pedersen via users
  • Re: rule assistence A. Schulze via users
• mailchip and negative points - new phish? Greg Troxel
  • RE: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Marc
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Jimmy
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Bill Cole
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Bill Cole
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Greg Troxel
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? John Levine
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Bill Cole
  • RE: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Marc
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? John Levine
  • Re: mailchip and negative points - new phish? Martin F via users
• How to debug SA to identify long running body check? Lichtinger, Bernhard
  • Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check? Bill Cole
  • Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check? Lichtinger, Bernhard
  • Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: How to debug SA to identify long running body check? Lichtinger, Bernhard
• [ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers Simon Bressier
  • Re: [ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers Jimmy
  • Re: [ANN] Mailuminati Guardian: open source collaborative fuzzy learning (TLSH/LSH) seeking beta testers Simon Bressier
• Amazon links + Google groups phishing spam. And big boxes? Mark London
  • Re: Amazon links + Google groups phishing spam. And big boxes? Niamh Holding
• URIBL_BLACK Niamh Holding
• Still seeing lots of false positives caused by SHOPIFY_IMG_NOT_RCVD_SFY Niamh Holding

• Earlier messages